지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, we have discussed and proposed alternatives for the taxation of partnership whose partners are both (ⅰ) non-resident or foreign entities and (ⅱ) passive partners under the current partnership taxation rules of the Special Tax Treatment Control Act. The current rules provide, where a partnership has a permanent establishment (“PE”) in Korea, that a partner who is not a passive partner is to be regarded as also having a PE in Korea, while a passive partner is to be regarded as having no PE in Korea. As such, taxation on each passive partner is completed through an income tax withholding on a gross revenue allocated by and received from the partnership.
Under the partnership taxation rules, a partnership is to be regarded as a non-resident or a foreign corporation when calculating the amount of income allocated to its non-resident or foreign corporation partners. Currently, there is no clear provision under the Korean tax law stipulating the method of calculating the amount of income allocated to passive partners for which two contrasting views may exist.
One view is that the income of partnerships should be calculated in aggregate, taking into account all the revenue earned and expenses incurred by the partnership considering the fact that the partnership has a PE in Korea. This approach is problematic in that such aggregate income calculation method conceptually does not go well with a separate withholding taxation method and also in that neutrality in taxation may not be secured because different tax effects would result under this view compared with the cases where such partners operates their businesses individually.
Another view is that the income of the partnership allocated to its passive partners should be considered and calculated separately by type of income generated at the partnership level as long as passive partners are regarded as not having a PE in Korea. This view may seem reasonable in that taxation on passive partners are completed through an separate income tax withholding rather than normal tax filings which considers all the Korean source revenue and expenses attributable to a PE in Korea. However, in that the income of passive partners and that of non-passive partners should be calculated separately and differently, this view does not match with the current partnership taxation rules which provide no difference between passive partners and non-passive partners in the calculation of the partnership income allocated to non-resident partners or foreign corporation partners.
Both of the above views would raise issues, and the selection between these two would be a matter of policy. However, in case where a partnership income allocated to passive partners is calculated in aggregate taking into account all the revenue earned and expenses incurred by the partnership, the passive partner should, in principle, be taxed in the same way as non-passive partners who has a PE in Korea in connection with the partnership. On the other hand, to tax the passive partners through a separate withholding taxation, calculation method of the partnership income allocated to passive partners shall be designed in line with the separate withholding taxation system.
Under the partnership taxation rules, a partnership is to be regarded as a non-resident or a foreign corporation when calculating the amount of income allocated to its non-resident or foreign corporation partners. Currently, there is no clear provision under the Korean tax law stipulating the method of calculating the amount of income allocated to passive partners for which two contrasting views may exist.
One view is that the income of partnerships should be calculated in aggregate, taking into account all the revenue earned and expenses incurred by the partnership considering the fact that the partnership has a PE in Korea. This approach is problematic in that such aggregate income calculation method conceptually does not go well with a separate withholding taxation method and also in that neutrality in taxation may not be secured because different tax effects would result under this view compared with the cases where such partners operates their businesses individually.
Another view is that the income of the partnership allocated to its passive partners should be considered and calculated separately by type of income generated at the partnership level as long as passive partners are regarded as not having a PE in Korea. This view may seem reasonable in that taxation on passive partners are completed through an separate income tax withholding rather than normal tax filings which considers all the Korean source revenue and expenses attributable to a PE in Korea. However, in that the income of passive partners and that of non-passive partners should be calculated separately and differently, this view does not match with the current partnership taxation rules which provide no difference between passive partners and non-passive partners in the calculation of the partnership income allocated to non-resident partners or foreign corporation partners.
Both of the above views would raise issues, and the selection between these two would be a matter of policy. However, in case where a partnership income allocated to passive partners is calculated in aggregate taking into account all the revenue earned and expenses incurred by the partnership, the passive partner should, in principle, be taxed in the same way as non-passive partners who has a PE in Korea in connection with the partnership. On the other hand, to tax the passive partners through a separate withholding taxation, calculation method of the partnership income allocated to passive partners shall be designed in line with the separate withholding taxation system.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 외국인인 수동적 동업자에 대한 과세의 개요
Ⅲ. 외국인인 수동적 동업자에 대한 현행 과세제도의 문제점과 개선방안
Ⅳ. 결론
〈參考文獻〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조세특례제한법상 동업기업의 분배에 관한 연구
경영법률
2010 .01
-
[Session B6. SCM(2)] Two Measures of Customer-Supplier Partnership: Levels of Satisfaction with the Partner and Quality of Partnership with the Partner
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2001 .04
-
외국계 파트너십의 국내진출에 따른 과세문제
조세학술논집
2008 .02
-
지역파트너쉽의 형성과 변화과정에 관한 연구
한국사회와 행정연구
2010 .05
-
파트너십 과세제도의 도입 필요성과 방안에 관한 연구
대한경영학회지
2007 .10
-
동업기업에 적용되는 가산세의 과세 상 문제점
기업법연구
2009 .06
-
동업기업의 손익배분에 관한 연구
조세학술논집
2009 .08
-
조세회피방지를 위한 동업기업과세제도의 개선방안
조세연구
2011 .08
-
동업기업과세제도의 조세회피 관련 규정에 관한 연구
조세연구
2014 .12
-
동업기업 지분가액의 조정에 관한 연구
조세법연구
2009 .08
-
Subject : Personal Liability of partner for payment to Estate of the deceased partner. : Matter : General Partnership Agreement
법정논총
1983 .02
-
파트너 조직문화에 대한 민감성과 관계 효과성에 관한 연구 : 국제합작제휴를 중심으로
무역학회지
2007 .04
-
독일의 파트너십에 대한 과세제도 : 파트너와 파트너십간의 거래에 대한 과세를 중심으로
조세연구
2008 .12
-
組合課稅에 관한 判例硏究 : 출자, 지분양도 및 노무제공과 관련하여
조세법연구
2002 .07
-
감사인 유형에 따른 감사파트너교체와 이익조정
경영교육연구
2017 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
미국의 신탁과세제도와 그 시사점
김병일
,
김종해
조세연구
2010
.04
동업기업 과세상의 실질적인 경제적 효과 테스트의 도입에 관한 연구
김도형
조세연구
2012
.12
동업기업 세제 도입에 따른 기업형태별 적절한 과세방안에 관한 연구 : 기업형태 선택에 관한 조세중립성의 측면을 중심으로
윤지현
조세법연구
2008
.08
‘단체 분류(Entity Classification)’에 관한 대법원 판례와 경제협력개발기구(OECD)의 ‘파트너쉽 보고서(Partnership Report)’의 조화(調和) 가능성에 관한 검토 : 해석론과 문제점을 중심으로
윤지현
조세학술논집
2014
.02
신탁소득 과세상 도관이론 적용의 문제점 : 법인세법 제5조 제1항을 중심으로
손영철
,
남태현
법학논총
2014
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-329-003380206