지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 2 (130page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The criminal mediation in Korea is assessed to have, in many aspects, affirmative effects but cannot be considered to be a perfect system. That is, it may raise the fear of a victim because she or he should face an offender and also mediators cannot resolve the imbalance of power between a victim and an offender. Also, it can invade the right to fair trial. Therefore, a criminal mediation should not be used for the mere diversion for an offender. we should find out the balancing point to support the fundamental principle for the basic paradigm of restorative justice in the criminal justice system in conflicting values.
We should find out the proper model in the incorporation of restorative justice paradigm into traditional criminal justice system. In the practical aspect, that kind of model may not sufficiently support the basic principle of restorative justice paradigm but would be still meaningful in that it can resolve the dispute that is hard to be dealt with in the traditional criminal justice system.
Now in Korea, since Jun 2007, the criminal mediation in the victim support service has been operated. The success of mediations comes more than 50% in the national level and is assessed positively for its effectiveness. Nonetheless, the criminal mediation has been operated for particular crimes without any statutory ground but pursuant to the guidance of the prosecutor's office and the guidance of the victim support service. The introduction of the criminal mediation does not come from the ideal of the restorative justice but start for the reason of the voluntary resolution of criminal dispute and the efficient function of the prosecutor's office.
The subject of the current criminal mediation is limited to the minor crimes. Also, because a victim support service which works as mediation institute is closely related to the prosecutor's office, there is a question of neutrality. Moreover, it often happens that a mediator does not get sufficient information of cases. In addition, the issue of restoration of relationship of parties is not dealt with so well because mediators has worked so excessively to achieve agreement of parties.
For the better practice of criminal mediation, we should focus on the voluntary operation of mediation by parties, rather than the growth of simple results of agreements. It should be noted that the core ideal of criminal mediation is not in the reparation of damages but in the restoration of relationship of parties.
To incorporate the value and philosophy of restorative justice into the criminal justice system, it must be desirable to reform many problems of criminal mediation and also take as many criminal cases as possible to the criminal mediation. In this sense, we should consider the mandatory mediation system for an offender, even though an offender does not volunteer to mediation. This mandatory mediation may work in relation to suspension of indictment, probation and suspended sentence. It would rather legislate a mediation system in which the conditional suspended prosecution not to violate the presumption of innocence. Also, with the condition of serious efforts for mediation, a new type of probation can be considered. Nonetheless, the conditional probation system should not be legislated if it has a mandatory means. If the voluntariness cannot be the precondition of mediation, the ideal of mediation will be far from the place of true realization.
We should find out the proper model in the incorporation of restorative justice paradigm into traditional criminal justice system. In the practical aspect, that kind of model may not sufficiently support the basic principle of restorative justice paradigm but would be still meaningful in that it can resolve the dispute that is hard to be dealt with in the traditional criminal justice system.
Now in Korea, since Jun 2007, the criminal mediation in the victim support service has been operated. The success of mediations comes more than 50% in the national level and is assessed positively for its effectiveness. Nonetheless, the criminal mediation has been operated for particular crimes without any statutory ground but pursuant to the guidance of the prosecutor's office and the guidance of the victim support service. The introduction of the criminal mediation does not come from the ideal of the restorative justice but start for the reason of the voluntary resolution of criminal dispute and the efficient function of the prosecutor's office.
The subject of the current criminal mediation is limited to the minor crimes. Also, because a victim support service which works as mediation institute is closely related to the prosecutor's office, there is a question of neutrality. Moreover, it often happens that a mediator does not get sufficient information of cases. In addition, the issue of restoration of relationship of parties is not dealt with so well because mediators has worked so excessively to achieve agreement of parties.
For the better practice of criminal mediation, we should focus on the voluntary operation of mediation by parties, rather than the growth of simple results of agreements. It should be noted that the core ideal of criminal mediation is not in the reparation of damages but in the restoration of relationship of parties.
To incorporate the value and philosophy of restorative justice into the criminal justice system, it must be desirable to reform many problems of criminal mediation and also take as many criminal cases as possible to the criminal mediation. In this sense, we should consider the mandatory mediation system for an offender, even though an offender does not volunteer to mediation. This mandatory mediation may work in relation to suspension of indictment, probation and suspended sentence. It would rather legislate a mediation system in which the conditional suspended prosecution not to violate the presumption of innocence. Also, with the condition of serious efforts for mediation, a new type of probation can be considered. Nonetheless, the conditional probation system should not be legislated if it has a mandatory means. If the voluntariness cannot be the precondition of mediation, the ideal of mediation will be far from the place of true realization.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 형사화해조정제도 도입에 있어서 법이론적 문제점 검토
제3장 미국, 영국, 캐나다, 프랑스, 독일의 형사상 화해조정제도의 운영 및 평가
제4장 현행 형사조정제도의 운영현황에 대한 평가분석
제5장 형사화해조정을 통한 형사사법비용 절감효과
제6장 형사화해조정제도 구축에 있어서 논의의 기초와 전망
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
형사상 조정제도의 목적에 따른 분류와 그 절차적 함의 -미국의 논의를 중심으로-
피해자학연구
2009 .01
-
우리나라 형사화해제도에 대한 검토
동아법학
2009 .08
-
회복적 사법의 실천으로서 형사조정
한양법학
2015 .11
-
새로운 범죄대응전략으로서 화해조정체계구축방안(Ⅱ) - 형사화해조정체계의 구축을 위한 법적ㆍ제도적 정비방안 총괄보고서
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2009 .12
-
현행 범죄피해자보호법상 형사조정제도의 검토
피해자학연구
2011 .01
-
[새로운 범죄대응전략으로서 화해조정체계구축(Ⅰ)] 형사사법체계내 형사조정제도 도입에 따른 법이론적 문제점 및 개선방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
형사조정프로그램에 대한 조정위원의 평가 - 조정위원 설문조사 결과를 중심으로 -
피해자학연구
2012 .01
-
刑事調停制度의 活性化方案
원광법학
2013 .01
-
나이사이(內濟)제도에 대한 小考 - 일본 에도(江戶)시대의 전통적인 대체적 분쟁해결방법 -
피해자학연구
2012 .01
-
중국의 상사조정제도와 그 시사점에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2015 .05
-
범죄피해자 보호를 위한 형사조정활성화 방안 : 사법경찰관리의 역할강화
법학연구
2015 .06
-
형사조정프로그램의 실효성 평가
피해자학연구
2012 .01
-
형사조정프로그램의 이상적인 모델구성과 적용방안
한국공안행정학회보
2010 .01
-
경찰단계에서의 형사조정제도도입의 필요성에 대한 연구
한국공안행정학회보
2015 .01
-
中國의 法院調停에 관한 硏究
중국법연구
2010 .01
-
형사조정의 실시 현황과 결과에 대한 실증적 평가 분석: 2010년과 2014년 형사조정사건을 중심으로
한국경찰학회보
2016 .01
-
유럽연합조정지침에 따른 유럽연합 각국의 조정관련 입법의 내용과 조정시스템의 변화에 대한 고찰
중앙법학
2017 .03
-
범죄유형에 따른 형사조정 특성에 관한 경험적 고찰 : 폭행 및 상해, 사기 사건을 중심으로
형사정책연구
2018 .09
-
형사조정 과정에 대한 참여자의 평가
한국경찰학회보
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
[새로운 범죄대응전략으로서 화해조정체계구축(Ⅰ)] 주요 외국의 형사화해조정 운용 및 평가에 관한 연구
탁희성
,
강우예
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008
.12
형사조정프로그램과 조정위원의 역할
이동원
형사정책연구
2009
.03
부부폭력 피해여성의 적극적 대응에 영향을미치는 요인 검증 : 생태학적 이론을 중심으로
홍태경
경찰학연구
2015
.09
유엔기후변화협상에 관한 세계시민회의 결과의 국제비교
김직수
,
이영희
과학기술학연구
2015
.12
ʻ지구적 숙의 거버넌스ʼ 로서 유엔기후변화협상에 관한 세계시민회의
이영희
,
정인경
과학기술학연구
2015
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-364-002068671