지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In recent years, as a consequence of the globalization of Research and Development(R&D), researchers must increasingly be aware of world-wide trends and cooperate with international R&D institute.
The Joint Research has a consistently high record of achievement in research, and it is the New government strong commitment towards research which attracts large amounts of research grant income.
Survival in today s fast-paced business environment requires fast learning how to team up with foreign independent research organization to survive world and acquire Science and technology.
It is best way to emulate the success of the university United States and Japan, whose system is one of the most remarkable IP Policy. Stanford University, Massachsetts institute of Technlogy(MIT), and The University of Electronic-Communiciations(UEC)'s IP policy give us lessons like these are helping us move forward- with careful steps. While it may not be so perfect, though, there are implications for the make the our Intellectual Property Policy(IP Policy).
This Study considered the matter from various angles and designed to improve compare experiences and review policy and management issues in IP policy. In this paper proposes to enact the reasonable and applicable research institute's intellectual property policy proposal.
A private enterprise have several options for Intellectual Property Rights such as ownership of inventions and license. The option a corporation select determines which commercialize Inventions.
[IP Policy]
1. Inventions created by only the Researcher Institute shall be owned itself.
2. Inventions created by the Researcher Institute and collaborator shall be owned jointly Institute and collaborator. The share of Inventions will be determined according to the contribution.
3. [Option A : Research institute Sole inventions]
1) Assignment of Intellectual Property
2) Grant of limtied-term, exclusive license
3) Grant of limited-term non exclusive license
4) No grant of license
4. [Option B : Joint inventions]
1) Assignment of Intellectual Property
2) Grant of limited-term, exclusive license(including distribution license fee, if grant a non-exclusive license to a third party)
3) Grant of non-exclusive license
4) No grant of License
International cooperation and Joint R&D are the main stream of the 'open innovation R&D' and can time to take the leap advanced country. It is necessary for us to get a new IP Policy to develop world wide famous research instittue and protect efficient of rewards from R&D.
The Joint Research has a consistently high record of achievement in research, and it is the New government strong commitment towards research which attracts large amounts of research grant income.
Survival in today s fast-paced business environment requires fast learning how to team up with foreign independent research organization to survive world and acquire Science and technology.
It is best way to emulate the success of the university United States and Japan, whose system is one of the most remarkable IP Policy. Stanford University, Massachsetts institute of Technlogy(MIT), and The University of Electronic-Communiciations(UEC)'s IP policy give us lessons like these are helping us move forward- with careful steps. While it may not be so perfect, though, there are implications for the make the our Intellectual Property Policy(IP Policy).
This Study considered the matter from various angles and designed to improve compare experiences and review policy and management issues in IP policy. In this paper proposes to enact the reasonable and applicable research institute's intellectual property policy proposal.
A private enterprise have several options for Intellectual Property Rights such as ownership of inventions and license. The option a corporation select determines which commercialize Inventions.
[IP Policy]
1. Inventions created by only the Researcher Institute shall be owned itself.
2. Inventions created by the Researcher Institute and collaborator shall be owned jointly Institute and collaborator. The share of Inventions will be determined according to the contribution.
3. [Option A : Research institute Sole inventions]
1) Assignment of Intellectual Property
2) Grant of limtied-term, exclusive license
3) Grant of limited-term non exclusive license
4) No grant of license
4. [Option B : Joint inventions]
1) Assignment of Intellectual Property
2) Grant of limited-term, exclusive license(including distribution license fee, if grant a non-exclusive license to a third party)
3) Grant of non-exclusive license
4) No grant of License
International cooperation and Joint R&D are the main stream of the 'open innovation R&D' and can time to take the leap advanced country. It is necessary for us to get a new IP Policy to develop world wide famous research instittue and protect efficient of rewards from R&D.
목차
Ⅰ. 序
Ⅱ. 國際硏究契約의 槪念과 法的性格
Ⅲ. 海外 先進硏究機關의 知的財産政策
Ⅳ. 우리나라 硏究機關 등의 知的財産政策 提案
Ⅴ. 結論
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
특허침해항변사유로서 묵시적 실시권 (Implied license)에 관한 연구 : 미국사례를 중심으로
지식재산연구
2008 .06
-
라이선스 남용과 독점규제법 적용의 한계 : 영미의 사례를 중심으로
기업법연구
2006 .06
-
소프트웨어 라이선스 관리시스템의 설계 및 구현 : K사 사례를 중심으로
Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
2013 .09
-
직무발명에 관한 섭외적 법률관계의 준거법과 사용자의 통상실시권 효력범위 -대법원 2015. 1. 15.선고 2012다4763 판결을 대상으로-
과학기술법연구
2015 .01
-
특허침해항변사유로서 묵시적 실시권(Implied license)에 관한 연구
법학연구
2008 .12
-
시큐리티 자격제도의 현황과 발전방안
한국정부학회 학술발표논문집
2008 .03
-
지적재산권 라이센스 거절에 대한 공정거래법의 적용 : EU 신규칙 및 일본의 신지침을 중심으로
한양법학
2010 .02
-
특허법상 강제실시권의 연구
법학연구
2005 .12
-
대학에서의 연구성과결과인 소위 대학발명에 대한 소고
경영법률
2005 .01
-
호텔자격증소지자 의무고용에 관한 연구
관광레저연구
2012 .07
-
직무발명제도의 개선을 통한 노사관계의 확립방안
경영법률
2008 .01
-
중국 행정허가법의 내용과 평가
공법학연구
2004 .12
-
국제라이선스계약상 경쟁제한조항에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2014 .12
-
정규교과를 통한 발명교육 프로그램 개발 연구
실과교육연구
2006 .01
-
지역간 연구지원 격차에 관한 연구
한국지역개발학회지
2012 .09
-
전용실시권과 미국법상 Exclusive License의 비교 : 개념 및 권리구제, 병행수입에서의 차이점을 중심으로
저스티스
2010 .12
-
권리사용료의 지급과 관세평가에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2016 .02
-
Open Source License의 법적 구조
경영법률
2004 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-366-001665383