지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this research, I've looked for about transition of 『il-eo-yu-hae』 and 『wae-eo yu hae』, based on Japanese of 『il-eo-yu-hae』 and 『wae-eo-yu-hae』. As a result, I found 2 branches, one is an identical conception between 『wae-eo-yu-hae』 and 『il-eo-yu-hae』, another is not. Details of discord parts between 『wae-eo-yu-hae』 and 『il-eo-yu-hae』, there is many kind of things are different. Because of system of description methods. Among them, it turned out the Japanese about principle of 『wae-eo-yu-hae』 and 『il-eo-yu-hae』 were the most discord part. The reason of discord part of noted materials is that the Japanese used 『wae-eo-yu-hae』 is not available when 『il-eo-yu-hae』 is compiled and a new Japanese is used for Chinese character. Also, at the period of 『wae-eo-yu-hae』 compiled, it was reflected with Kamikadago and it compiled, based on Kyo-to.
But period of 『il-eo-yu-hae』 compiled, To-Kyo language,based on Edogo, was already settled for common language. So I think such as Kansai dialect, part of Kamikadago system, was corrected because of necessity.
The other system, that is discord part in the Japanese, is difference of expression. exception(2), only does description of Chinese character of ha-wi record in 『wae-eo-yu-hae』 where the Japanese must be, is noted Chinese character of san-wi and a new Japanese Hun is noted at place Chinese character of ha-wi. In『il-eo-yu-hae』, noted Japanese's Hun, deleted Japanese from 『wae-eo-yu-hae』. It also have one that a new Hun is made from exception(2).
I think, these kind of things were added or deleted while period of 『il-eo-yu-hae』 compiled by common used or not. Including the fact that between the 『wae-eo-yu-hae』 of Chinese character of san-wi and 『il-eo-yu-hae』 of Chinese character of san-wi has no difference, there is a system that one of 『il-eo-yu-hae』 was written from Hun which consist of two of Japanese In 『wae-eo-yu-hae』. In 『wae-eo-yu-hae』, More than two japanese were written has indicating more than two of Japanese were commonly used and I assume the reason there's only one japanese was used in 『il-eo-yu-hae』 with the same title is it has followed by publishing-regulation.
The Japanese we can see from both 『wae-eo-yu-hae』 and 『il-eo-yu-hae』 is identical means these commonly used Japanese were the same at the time the each book had published.
And the Japanese we can see from both 『wac-eo-yu-hae』 and 『il-eo-yu-hae』 is not identical means these commonly used japanese were not the same at the time the each book had published.
But period of 『il-eo-yu-hae』 compiled, To-Kyo language,based on Edogo, was already settled for common language. So I think such as Kansai dialect, part of Kamikadago system, was corrected because of necessity.
The other system, that is discord part in the Japanese, is difference of expression. exception(2), only does description of Chinese character of ha-wi record in 『wae-eo-yu-hae』 where the Japanese must be, is noted Chinese character of san-wi and a new Japanese Hun is noted at place Chinese character of ha-wi. In『il-eo-yu-hae』, noted Japanese's Hun, deleted Japanese from 『wae-eo-yu-hae』. It also have one that a new Hun is made from exception(2).
I think, these kind of things were added or deleted while period of 『il-eo-yu-hae』 compiled by common used or not. Including the fact that between the 『wae-eo-yu-hae』 of Chinese character of san-wi and 『il-eo-yu-hae』 of Chinese character of san-wi has no difference, there is a system that one of 『il-eo-yu-hae』 was written from Hun which consist of two of Japanese In 『wae-eo-yu-hae』. In 『wae-eo-yu-hae』, More than two japanese were written has indicating more than two of Japanese were commonly used and I assume the reason there's only one japanese was used in 『il-eo-yu-hae』 with the same title is it has followed by publishing-regulation.
The Japanese we can see from both 『wae-eo-yu-hae』 and 『il-eo-yu-hae』 is identical means these commonly used Japanese were the same at the time the each book had published.
And the Japanese we can see from both 『wac-eo-yu-hae』 and 『il-eo-yu-hae』 is not identical means these commonly used japanese were not the same at the time the each book had published.
목차
1. 序論
2. 『日語類解』의 日本語에 대하여
3. 『倭語類解』와 『日語類解』의 日本語의 比較
4. 結論
?考文?
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『日語類解』의 일본어 표기와 음운에 대하여
동북아 문화연구
2010 .09
-
The Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on the Export Performance of Emerging Economies: A Multi-dimensional Approach
무역연구
2020 .01
-
어촌계에 관한 연구 (경영공동목적 관점에서)
수산경영론집
1970 .01
-
항공용 EO/IR 센서의 EO GRD 분해능 실험실 측정 연구
한국군사과학기술학회지
2014 .01
-
공간통계기법을 이용한 생태계 관리지역의 산림축적 추정
한국지리정보학회지
2015 .01
-
한국 대학교의 일본어 관련 학과의 과목명에 대하여
일본어교육연구
2014 .01
-
存齋 兪鎭河의 철학사상
충청문화연구
2015 .12
-
Academia and Cultural Production: Yu Dan and Her Confucius from the Heart: Ancient Wisdom for Today's World
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2015 .01
-
유관순 얼굴의 3D 디지털 복원과 활용방안
충청문화연구
2014 .12
-
A Study on the Korean Writing in Japanese - From an Educational Point of View of Japanese -
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2019 .07
-
대학 교양 일본어학습에 관한 기초조사 ‒ 서울소재 S대학의 교양 일본어학습자를 중심으로 ‒
일본근대학연구
2017 .01
-
유길준(兪吉濬)『서유견문(西遊見聞)』의 한국 특수교육사적 함의
특수교육재활과학연구
2009 .01
-
在日韓国人作家の作品に見られる日本語の異化と多様化についての考察－韓国語翻訳本との比較を中心として－
일본언어문화
2016 .01
-
어촌계 활성화를 위한 연구
수산경영론집
1984 .01
-
군용 EO/IR장비의 시험평가 기준 정립방안
한국군사과학기술학회지
2016 .01
-
유길준의「서유견문(西遊見聞)」에 나타난 초등교육의 공교육성과 본질
열린교육연구
2003 .01
-
동북아해역 출세어(出世魚) 명칭에 관한 연구
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .10
-
해운대 지역의 기후변화에 의한 해일고 변동에 따른 침수피해 평가
한국지형학회지
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-018938212