메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
문학과환경학회 문학과환경 문학과환경 제6권 2호
발행연도
2007.12
수록면
203 - 230 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Answering both “why” questions in science and “how” questions in literature, personifications connect both the secret of human desire and knowledge of the universe in a renewed context. In Peter Nicholls’s depiction of the interactions of science and myth, “art and science dance in a complex sarabande and winged archetypes are confronted with mathematics.” In this cosmic dance, literary narratives are often determined and ruled by scientific law but at the same time they also transcend scientific limitations with Gnostic “mind?bending” toward Ursuppe, the archetypal sea of knowledge. Here, as Erik Davis depicts, “technology is neither a devil nor an angel. But neither is it simply a ‘tool’.” Rather, Davis defines technology as a trickster. Showing “how intelligence fares in an unpredictable and chaotic world,” the technological personifications are “mischievous, riddling, and cross?wired.” They bump into actuality and create noise, wonder and chaos. But their blended spaces of science and literature are cognitively and rhetorically rich yet messy because they contain maximal information about differences. Understanding the archetypal Others and aliens inside the self as well as humans’ relative relations with the universe is the way to reach the order hidden in chaotic technological personifications. The enacted myth in literature of science creates techno?animism and tells about new liberating cosmocentric reality through its inherent philosophy of wholeness.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-810-001992146