지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The arguments about the implied author and (un)reliability are divided into two positions: One is the reader－oriented position and the other is the author - oriented position. Scholars such as Chatman, Nünning, Yacobi argued from the former position, and scholars such as Booth, Phelan, and Shaw argued from the later one. Chatman, first of all, considered the implied author as a related matter with communication by regarding it as a subject of the organization of the ‘Narrative Communication Diagram’. After the criticism on the substantiality, later on, Chatman defined it as the ‘intent’ and weakened characteristic of the author’s ‘personification’. Nünning, on the other hand, strongly denied the concept and the function of the implied author, emphasizing diverse reference frames of the readers as its substitute. However, changing his focus to ‘unreliability’, Nünning indirectly admitted the concept afterwards by showing ‘the authorial agent’. Yacobi also emphasized the ‘implied author’ and the author－oriented ‘genetic reading hypothesis’ while arguing that the ‘implied author’ is the essence in investing the ‘unreliable narration’.
Booth revealed, before his death, that he dedicated his whole life for communication. In fact, those concepts on the implied author are valid outputs, which Booth had modified through many arguments. Phelan also supported Booth’s opinion by emphasizing ‘personification’ in his later discussion. He showed a critical opinion in understanding the implied author from the functional perspective and he defined the implied author as a continual ‘authorial agency’ with emphasis on activity and personification. Later, Shaw explained the process of reader’s comprehension by replacing the ‘implied author’ with ‘narrator"s mind’ which was approved by opponent scholars. In other words, Shaw confirmed the category of the subject of actions on the right side of the diagram while imaging the ‘mind’ on the left side showing the ‘real author’, the ‘implied author’ and the ‘narrator’.
Examining arguments and conversions about the ‘implied author’ and ‘(un)reliability’, it seems clear that the concept of ‘implied author’ is not only Booth’s, but it is also a complex concept composed of diverse applications, critics, supports, and renewals of Booth’s concept. Especially, the ‘implied author’ has been revived recently in the demonstrations, with the focus on Chatman’s ‘Narrative Communication Diagram’, of the complex and deeply rooted reading process of the readers.
Recently, Phelan, Yacobi, and Shaw have taken both the reader－oriented position and author－oriented position and agreed that the ‘personification’ of the ‘implied author’ is necessary in the process of readers concrete apprehension. The process of communication with the ‘implied author’ has become effective to understand the narrator’s (un)reliability.
Booth revealed, before his death, that he dedicated his whole life for communication. In fact, those concepts on the implied author are valid outputs, which Booth had modified through many arguments. Phelan also supported Booth’s opinion by emphasizing ‘personification’ in his later discussion. He showed a critical opinion in understanding the implied author from the functional perspective and he defined the implied author as a continual ‘authorial agency’ with emphasis on activity and personification. Later, Shaw explained the process of reader’s comprehension by replacing the ‘implied author’ with ‘narrator"s mind’ which was approved by opponent scholars. In other words, Shaw confirmed the category of the subject of actions on the right side of the diagram while imaging the ‘mind’ on the left side showing the ‘real author’, the ‘implied author’ and the ‘narrator’.
Examining arguments and conversions about the ‘implied author’ and ‘(un)reliability’, it seems clear that the concept of ‘implied author’ is not only Booth’s, but it is also a complex concept composed of diverse applications, critics, supports, and renewals of Booth’s concept. Especially, the ‘implied author’ has been revived recently in the demonstrations, with the focus on Chatman’s ‘Narrative Communication Diagram’, of the complex and deeply rooted reading process of the readers.
Recently, Phelan, Yacobi, and Shaw have taken both the reader－oriented position and author－oriented position and agreed that the ‘personification’ of the ‘implied author’ is necessary in the process of readers concrete apprehension. The process of communication with the ‘implied author’ has become effective to understand the narrator’s (un)reliability.
목차
1. 서론
2. 독자 중심적 관점 : 채트먼, 뉘닝, 야코비
3. 저자 중심적 관점 : 부스, 펠란, 쇼
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
이청준 소설에 나타난 부부관계 양상 고찰
현대소설연구
2017 .06
-
‘암시된 저자’를 경유하는 시 텍스트의 독해 고찰 : ‘화자가 희미한(Nonnarrated) 텍스트’와 ‘결함이 있거나(Fallible) 신뢰할 수 없는(Unreliable) 화자의 텍스트’를 중심으로
한국시학연구
2016 .08
-
내포독자의 개념과 존재 양상
어문론총
2018 .12
-
독자가 바란다
창비어린이
2016 .06
-
독자가 바란다
창비어린이
2015 .09
-
독자가 바란다
창비어린이
2015 .12
-
독자가 바란다
창비어린이
2016 .03
-
‘사랑받는 제자’: 내재저자와 내재독자의 만남 : 요한복음 13:21-30; 19:25-27; 20:1-10을 중심으로
신학연구
2017 .12
-
Metaphorical Variation: Discourse Effect of Personification in Nouns of Korean and Japanese
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .11
-
『聖學十圖』 「心統性情圖」의 「中圖」 장르분석
퇴계학논집
2019 .01
-
일반 독자와 장르 독자
자음과모음
2019 .09
-
여성, 저자, 독자: (여성) 비평(가)의 불안 1
자음과모음
2020 .12
-
정보인지 전략으로서 서사와 신뢰할 수 없는 서술(자)
현대문학이론연구
2019 .01
-
해석학적 관점에서 본 치유와 축귀 - 마 17:14-20; 막 9:14-29; 눅 9:37-43a 병행 본문 비교를 통해 -
한국개혁신학
2023 .05
-
저자의 죽음
자음과모음
2020 .06
-
저자의 죽음
자음과모음
2020 .09
-
저자는 죽지 않았다: 케빈 밴후저의 커뮤니케이션 작인자를 통한 성경해석의 새로운 지평
조직신학연구
2024 .04
-
〈훈민가〉의 말하기 방식과 그 의의
한국민족문화
2018 .02
-
독자제언
수필미학
2020 .03
-
독자제언
수필미학
2020 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-810-001337956