지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to study the misuse of formal nouns in Japanese by Korean speakers. In japanese, when expressing the narrater's will or changing the narrater's intention and nuance, the formal noun has significant functions. But when Korean learners use Janpanese formal nouns, they are likely to get confused by interference from the mother-tongue. Comparing the formal nouns of Japanese and Korean, there are some differences in meaning and usage. As for the use of "Koto", "No", and "Mono", we should accurately understand their mutual similarity, difference, exchangeability, and unexchangeavility.
Though both "Koto" and "No" have the function of nominalizing the complement, "Koto" indicates abstract concept, while "No" is inclined to indicate concrete movement, state and event which are directly influenced by the five senses. This explains why "Koto" and "No" cannot be used interchangeably in nominalized complements. However, when "Koto" and "No" occur in the predicate of the main clause, they can be freely exchanged to indicate possibility, right or wrong, evaluation, judgement and thought.
We can say that the difference between "Koto" and "No" is whether they come from the whole or the individual point of view; that is, the difference between abstractness and concreteness. Having strong characteristics of noun substantives, "Koto" and "Mono" cannot be exchanged with other formal nouns in idiomatic expressions.
Though both "Koto" and "No" have the function of nominalizing the complement, "Koto" indicates abstract concept, while "No" is inclined to indicate concrete movement, state and event which are directly influenced by the five senses. This explains why "Koto" and "No" cannot be used interchangeably in nominalized complements. However, when "Koto" and "No" occur in the predicate of the main clause, they can be freely exchanged to indicate possibility, right or wrong, evaluation, judgement and thought.
We can say that the difference between "Koto" and "No" is whether they come from the whole or the individual point of view; that is, the difference between abstractness and concreteness. Having strong characteristics of noun substantives, "Koto" and "Mono" cannot be exchanged with other formal nouns in idiomatic expressions.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가기
Ⅱ. ‘ことㆍのㆍもの‘의 언어 운용
Ⅲ. 마무리
〈참고 문헌〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
日本語の形式名詞「こと」、「もの」、「の」について
인문과학연구
1991 .02
-
「もの」와 「こと」의 문법화에 관한 고찰 - ‘것’/‘일’과 대조하여 -
일본문화연구
2020 .10
-
명사와 국어사
한국어학
2014 .02
-
일본근대문학과 사계(四季) : 『고도(古都)』의 계절묘사를 통해본 가와바타 川端 문학의 특징
외국문학연구
2011 .02
-
의미 속성을 중심으로 한 명사 교육 내용 연구
국어교육연구
2012 .08
-
명사의 형태론
한국어학
2014 .02
-
Noun Compounds in Korean
신영어영문학회 학술발표회 자료집
2001 .08
-
‘N₁+N₂’ 형 합성명사 기술의 몇 문제
한국현대문학회 학술발표회자료집
2012 .08
-
추상 명사의 의미 분류
담화와인지
2009 .08
-
「こと · の」の使い分けに関する再考察 : スタイルと現場性の観点から
일본문화학보
2018 .02
-
「名詞＋ナ+名詞」における意味的考察
日本語敎育
2018 .01
-
무엇을 명사라고 하는가?
언어학
2008 .04
-
The Role of Head Nouns in Real-time Semantic Integration of Second Language Noun-noun Compounds
영어학연구
2012 .01
-
포르투갈어 무관사 명사의 해석
포르투갈-브라질 연구
2008 .01
-
名詞の意味関係と連体助詞の出現様相について : 日本語と韓国語を中心に
일어일문학
2013 .11
-
When Nouns Think They"re Adjectives : Errors in Korean EFL Learners" Nominal Compounding
영어학
2016 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-710-018493709