지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
While industrial action is an employee's activity to put economic pressure on an employer in a way of impeding employer's business, certain parts of business must not be stopped but be maintained for public interest. However, current labor legislation and collective agreements are not enough to provide an appropriate system maintaining certain parts of business for protection of public interest. Accordingly, this paper purports to review a present legal system based on theoretical analysis of maintaining certain parts of business from the critical point of view.
Advanced labor relation is to keep self-control and responsibility. Especially, the industrial action in public interest businesses must be exercised within the socially acceptable extent. That is, in exercising the right of industrial action, an employer and employee must maintain minimum service. Maintaining minimum service for public interest can be considered as an employer and employee's activity to fulfill their social responsibility as members of the society.
Restricting the right of industrial action requiring maintenance of minimum service is to harmoniously warrant the right of industrial action and public interest by preventing excessive encroachment on the right of industrial action. Maintaining minimum service for public interest can be accomplished by the culture and practices between an employer and employee or by observing maintenance of minimum service stipulated as a duty under the law.
Today, both an employer and employee do not have complete consciousness in Korea that necessary minimum service must be maintained for public interest. As the liberty of industrial action has been expanded, the necessity to recognize the limit of industrial action has been also increased. In this respect, it is demanded to introduce the duty of maintaining minimum service for public interest into labor legislation.
Advanced labor relation is to keep self-control and responsibility. Especially, the industrial action in public interest businesses must be exercised within the socially acceptable extent. That is, in exercising the right of industrial action, an employer and employee must maintain minimum service. Maintaining minimum service for public interest can be considered as an employer and employee's activity to fulfill their social responsibility as members of the society.
Restricting the right of industrial action requiring maintenance of minimum service is to harmoniously warrant the right of industrial action and public interest by preventing excessive encroachment on the right of industrial action. Maintaining minimum service for public interest can be accomplished by the culture and practices between an employer and employee or by observing maintenance of minimum service stipulated as a duty under the law.
Today, both an employer and employee do not have complete consciousness in Korea that necessary minimum service must be maintained for public interest. As the liberty of industrial action has been expanded, the necessity to recognize the limit of industrial action has been also increased. In this respect, it is demanded to introduce the duty of maintaining minimum service for public interest into labor legislation.
목차
Ⅰ. 논의의 배경
Ⅱ.쟁의행위권 행사의 한계로서 일정 업무의 유지에 관한 법리적 분석
Ⅲ. 현행 법제도에 관한 검토
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
필수유지업무제도에 대한 비판적 고찰
노동법포럼
2010 .04
-
필수유지업무결정 제도의 해석론적 쟁점에 대한 시론
노동법연구
2009 .09
-
쟁의행위기간 중 대체근로제한에 관한 연구
노동법학
2010 .06
-
노동3권 보장과 쟁의행위의 개념 및 민·형사상 면책의 의미
노동법논총
2013 .04
-
쟁의행위의 절차적 정당성
노동법연구
2002 .06
-
파업시 유지되는 필수유지업무의 범위와 관련조항의 법리적 해석
노동법학
2007 .12
-
간접고용하의 부당노동행위 사례와 보호방안
노동법논총
2010 .08
-
사용자의 경영권과 근로자의 노동3권의 충돌에 관한 연구
산업관계연구
2007 .06
-
사용자의 지시에 대한 근로자의 대응과 그 효과
강원법학
2008 .06
-
사내도급 고용관계에서 부당노동행위 책임 - 미국 공동사용자 원리와 비교
노동법포럼
2017 .07
-
필수유지업무제도의 내용과 한계 : 필수유지업무결정 절차에 대한 개선방안
노동법학
2013 .03
-
사용자의 개념정립과 그 확장범위에 관한 법적 연구
노동법포럼
2013 .04
-
준법투쟁에 관한 비판적 재고찰
노동법포럼
2019 .11
-
사용자 지시권의 내재적 한계와 제한의 결정원리
노동법학
2007 .06
-
공무원노조법의 주요쟁점에 대한 검토
노동법학
2008 .06
-
미국 연방정부 공무원의 노동기본권 보장과 구성
노동법학
2017 .06
-
공무원의 노동관계법상 지위에 관한 연구
노동법포럼
2010 .04
-
집단적 노동관계법에서 사용자 책임의 확대―간접고용을 중심으로―
노동법학
2004 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018446920