지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korean Guardian System is to be divided into the guardian register for minors and that for incompetent and quasi-incompetent.
The guardian register for minors is said to be the extension of parental rights, whereas the guardian register for incompetent and quasiincompetent is a system which restricts the legal capacity of the mental retardation who are persons of legal age(therefore, is free from parental rights) but wanting in normal judgment and makes up for their limited capacity and therefore helps them form their legal relationship the same as the normal legal persons do and manage their social life as well. Like this, the Guardian Register is a system for the purpose of seeking the safety of dealings as well as of the person without legal capacity with standardizing the persons who are in complete in their mental capacity or are devoid of communicative competence.
No sooner has the adjudgment for incompetent?quasi-incompetent been decided than the administrative official of the family court or the person who may concern gives a public notice of the intention and notifies the person concerned or the person who is in charge of the family register affairs at the-person-in-case's legal domicile of the said intention and, upon the written notice, the person himself will be mentioned as a incompetentㆍquasi-incompetent on the family register. Like this, the current system of incompetent?quasi-incompetent is announced publicly to the third person with its entered in the family register.
The said system is for announcing the fact publicly that the person's legal capacity has made restricted or curtailed, but it causes some problem of making the person himself/herself or his/her family feel a sense of shame in their social life due to indication of him/her as “Incompetent Person” on the official register like family register. In case a family don't want to make the fact clear that they have a family member without legal capacity and, particularly, as far as marriage is concerned the one having some time ahead to marry can look into the other's family register, which will cause a strong rejection symptom to the people at large. In addition, because all information related with one's identity is integrated in our family register, the fact that one has received adjudgment of incompetent ㆍquasi-incompetent should be disclosed definitely even in the case of submitting a transcript or abstract of one's family register to the authorities concerned for any other purpose. In that respect, the current family registry system suggests the necessity for the introduction of a new system. Besides, the conventional system of a family register will be abolished and a new individualized identification system be executed as of Jan. 01, 2006 in Korea. Abolition of the system of a family register will be a good opportunity for our looking for a new system of a guardian register.
This study is aiming at activating the current system of incompetent? quasi-incompetent through our full consideration of a new system of guardian register.
The guardian register for minors is said to be the extension of parental rights, whereas the guardian register for incompetent and quasiincompetent is a system which restricts the legal capacity of the mental retardation who are persons of legal age(therefore, is free from parental rights) but wanting in normal judgment and makes up for their limited capacity and therefore helps them form their legal relationship the same as the normal legal persons do and manage their social life as well. Like this, the Guardian Register is a system for the purpose of seeking the safety of dealings as well as of the person without legal capacity with standardizing the persons who are in complete in their mental capacity or are devoid of communicative competence.
No sooner has the adjudgment for incompetent?quasi-incompetent been decided than the administrative official of the family court or the person who may concern gives a public notice of the intention and notifies the person concerned or the person who is in charge of the family register affairs at the-person-in-case's legal domicile of the said intention and, upon the written notice, the person himself will be mentioned as a incompetentㆍquasi-incompetent on the family register. Like this, the current system of incompetent?quasi-incompetent is announced publicly to the third person with its entered in the family register.
The said system is for announcing the fact publicly that the person's legal capacity has made restricted or curtailed, but it causes some problem of making the person himself/herself or his/her family feel a sense of shame in their social life due to indication of him/her as “Incompetent Person” on the official register like family register. In case a family don't want to make the fact clear that they have a family member without legal capacity and, particularly, as far as marriage is concerned the one having some time ahead to marry can look into the other's family register, which will cause a strong rejection symptom to the people at large. In addition, because all information related with one's identity is integrated in our family register, the fact that one has received adjudgment of incompetent ㆍquasi-incompetent should be disclosed definitely even in the case of submitting a transcript or abstract of one's family register to the authorities concerned for any other purpose. In that respect, the current family registry system suggests the necessity for the introduction of a new system. Besides, the conventional system of a family register will be abolished and a new individualized identification system be executed as of Jan. 01, 2006 in Korea. Abolition of the system of a family register will be a good opportunity for our looking for a new system of a guardian register.
This study is aiming at activating the current system of incompetent? quasi-incompetent through our full consideration of a new system of guardian register.
목차
Ⅰ. 問題의 提起
Ⅱ. 現行後見人登錄制度의 問題點
Ⅲ. 새로운 後見登錄制度의 立法方向
Ⅳ. 새로운 後見登錄制度의 立法內容
Ⅴ. 結論
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
행위무능력자제도에 대한 검토
중앙법학
2007 .10
-
무능력자제도에 관한 몇 가지 문제점의 검토
한양법학
2004 .06
-
成年後見登錄制度에 관한 小考
법학연구
2010 .06
-
成年後見制度의 立法化를 위한 考察
법학연구
2006 .11
-
미국법상 절차 보조인에 관하여- 민사소송과 성년후견절차를 중심으로 -
원광법학
2017 .01
-
호주제도 폐지에 따른 민법규정 및 호적제도의 검토
법학연구
2006 .02
-
동의능력이 없는 어린이 피험자 중심으로 살펴본 임상실험의 윤리적·법적 문제
법철학연구
2003 .12
-
중국 호적제도의 현안 과제 및 개혁방향에 관한 소고
법학연구
2018 .06
-
日本における成年後見制度の問題点
한림법학 FORUM
2009 .12
-
高齡化 社會에서의 成年後見에 관한 硏究
법과 정책연구
2008 .01
-
부산시 공직부적격자 특별관리제도에 대한 공무원의 반응과 과제
사회과학연구
2008 .09
-
行爲無能力制度와 後見制度의 問題點
동아법학
2004 .12
-
환자 보호자에 대한 민사법적 고찰 - 환자가 발달장애인인 경우를 중심으로 -
법학논총
2020 .06
-
A New Horizon in the Study of the Household Register during the Joseon Period
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2003 .01
-
한국의 가계계승에서 여성의 지위 : 식민지기 女性戶主를 중심으로
법사학연구
2013 .04
-
장애성년후견제도 도입에 관한 소고
중앙법학
2008 .12
-
피성년후견인의 선거권 등 제한에 대한 법적 고찰
사회보장법연구
2015 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018425538