지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In last 20th century, the global industrialization and the development of science and technology which had rapidly progressed have given human beings the material affluence but the man's merciless exploitation and ruin of nature have caused a very serious crisis of ruin of ecology and human beings themselves. Such criticisms that anthropocentrism, instrumental nature-view and mechanical world-view underly such global life-crisis have been bought forward and also such powerful requests that we must shift to new paradigm such as ecological world-view to solve the life-crisis have been raised. So I will examine the possibility of the mutual aid between western environmental philosophy and Wang Yang-ruing' Han-mom philosophy to solve the modern life-crises.
Arne Naess, who proposes Ecosophy T having only one ultimate norm: "Self-realization", insists to enlarge self from narrow egoistic self to Self embracing all life forms on the planet and then to maximize (long-range, univeral) Self-realization, diversity and symbiosis. It is the way to solve the modern ecological problems. Thomas Berry insists that, to be viable, our sense of reality and of value must shift from an anthropocentric to a biocentric norm of reference. And we must begin by accepting the fact that the life community, the community of all living species, is the greater reality and the greater value, and that the primary concern of the human must be the preservation and enhancement of this larger community.
But Wang Yang-ming's Han-mom philosophy is based on the dynamic capacity for self-organization of universal all nature, psychological and physical property of Chi(*D, and reciprocity between human and nature. And it calls human individual desire that separates human himself from nature and ruins nature to fulfill human interests to account and then insists that we must remove individual desire and rehabilitate the original benevolence and the sense of pain toward universal all nature through our own intemaI self-awakening and then we have not only to realize human life-essence but also to embody creative realization of natural life through the practical activity of affection for natural world.
Eco-philosophy can make a firm basis which can put its principles into dynamic and practical activity by supplement of Han-mom philosophy. And Han-mom philosophy can be a practical alternative plan to solve the problem related with ecological crisis by meet with such eco-philosophy that suggests the concrete counterproposal to solve the modem ecological problems through analyzing the diverse background of ecological problems and basing on the results of ecology.
Arne Naess, who proposes Ecosophy T having only one ultimate norm: "Self-realization", insists to enlarge self from narrow egoistic self to Self embracing all life forms on the planet and then to maximize (long-range, univeral) Self-realization, diversity and symbiosis. It is the way to solve the modern ecological problems. Thomas Berry insists that, to be viable, our sense of reality and of value must shift from an anthropocentric to a biocentric norm of reference. And we must begin by accepting the fact that the life community, the community of all living species, is the greater reality and the greater value, and that the primary concern of the human must be the preservation and enhancement of this larger community.
But Wang Yang-ming's Han-mom philosophy is based on the dynamic capacity for self-organization of universal all nature, psychological and physical property of Chi(*D, and reciprocity between human and nature. And it calls human individual desire that separates human himself from nature and ruins nature to fulfill human interests to account and then insists that we must remove individual desire and rehabilitate the original benevolence and the sense of pain toward universal all nature through our own intemaI self-awakening and then we have not only to realize human life-essence but also to embody creative realization of natural life through the practical activity of affection for natural world.
Eco-philosophy can make a firm basis which can put its principles into dynamic and practical activity by supplement of Han-mom philosophy. And Han-mom philosophy can be a practical alternative plan to solve the problem related with ecological crisis by meet with such eco-philosophy that suggests the concrete counterproposal to solve the modem ecological problems through analyzing the diverse background of ecological problems and basing on the results of ecology.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 환경철학의 개체중심적 접근
Ⅲ. 생태 위기와 생태철학의 대응
Ⅳ. 왕양명의 한몸철학
Ⅴ. 한몸철학과 생태철학의 공조
Ⅵ. 나오는 말
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
온생명과 왕양명의 한몸철학
철학연구
2001 .02
-
철학 , 우리에게 무엇인가 ?
철학연구
2001 .09
-
[99 동향과 전망]'오사도吾師道'와 '필로소피'(Philosophy)
오늘의 동양사상
2000 .09
-
생태철학적 사유방식과 산림의 의미
철학연구
2016 .03
-
21세기와 王陽明의 인간관
양명학
2000 .08
-
‘Global Philosophy’를 향하여
철학과 현실
2013 .09
-
생명철학의 함의와 도가의 생명철학적 특성
현대유럽철학연구
2020 .01
-
왕양명의 생명철학과 참 자아 실현의 교육론
양명학
2004 .02
-
‘조선철학’ 대 ‘한국철학’ : ‘북’의 조선철학 연구 특징과 남북철학의 공동연구 가능성
시대와 철학
2019 .01
-
이준연 동화에 나타난 생태의식 고찰
아동청소년문학연구
2011 .06
-
한말 전환기 사상과양명학 : 백암 박은식의 사상을 중심으로
양명학
2001 .02
-
한승원의 중편소설「폐촌」과 정신분석학적 생태비평
문학과환경
2006 .12
-
The Reception of Western Philosophy & Philosophy in Korea
Korea Journal
1999 .03
-
왕양명의 심학(心學)과 공감
유학연구
2019 .01
-
2000년대 이후 북한철학계의 연구경향과 그 특징―『철학연구』(2000-2016)을 중심으로―
민족문화연구
2019 .01
-
The Crisis of Philosophy : Technology and Excess
철학연구
2001 .05
-
분석철학과 한국철학
철학
1993 .06
-
한국현대문학과 생태의식
한국현대문학연구
2004 .06
-
종교개혁과 근대철학의 형성
철학연구
2013 .06
-
율곡 『聖學輯要』의 성왕론 - 『大學衍義』, 『聖學十圖』와 비교를 중심으로
율곡학연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-002105767