지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Article 35 of the Administrative Litigation Act(Standing to Sue for Litigation for Affirmation of Nullity, etc.) provides: "A litigation for the affirmation of nullity, etc. may be instituted by a person having legal interests to seek the affirmation of effectiveness or ineffectiveness, or existence or non-existence of a disposition, etc."
Recently Supreme Court has answered to the question whether the existence of a direct remedy such as enforcement proceedings under the presumption of nullity of administrative disposition should be considered in determining whether the "legal interests seeking the affirmation of nullity" under Article 35 of the Administrative Litigation Act exist.
According to Supreme Court en banc [Full Bench] Decision 2007Du6342 delivered on March 20, 2008, the supplementary nature of a declaratory action for the affirmation of nullity is not demanded, and therefore it should be interpreted that the issue of whether a direct remedy such as enforcement proceedings presuming nullity of administrative disposition exists needs not be considered.
The issue of acknowledging supplementary nature of a declaratory action for the affirmation of nullity is related to interpretation of "legal interests seeking the affirmation of nullity" of Article 35 of the Administrative Litigation Act. Thus, from the aspects of special nature of administrative litigation, a legal nature of a declaratory action for the affirmation of a nullity, its practical effectiveness, examples of foreign legislations, the possibility of its abuse, and strengthening of remedies for rights and interests, not to demand the supplementary nature of a declaratory action for the affirmation of nullity consists with achievement with the purpose of administrative litigation, reasonableness from the aspect of economics of legal action, and the recent trend of the Supreme Court Decisions.
Recently Supreme Court has answered to the question whether the existence of a direct remedy such as enforcement proceedings under the presumption of nullity of administrative disposition should be considered in determining whether the "legal interests seeking the affirmation of nullity" under Article 35 of the Administrative Litigation Act exist.
According to Supreme Court en banc [Full Bench] Decision 2007Du6342 delivered on March 20, 2008, the supplementary nature of a declaratory action for the affirmation of nullity is not demanded, and therefore it should be interpreted that the issue of whether a direct remedy such as enforcement proceedings presuming nullity of administrative disposition exists needs not be considered.
The issue of acknowledging supplementary nature of a declaratory action for the affirmation of nullity is related to interpretation of "legal interests seeking the affirmation of nullity" of Article 35 of the Administrative Litigation Act. Thus, from the aspects of special nature of administrative litigation, a legal nature of a declaratory action for the affirmation of a nullity, its practical effectiveness, examples of foreign legislations, the possibility of its abuse, and strengthening of remedies for rights and interests, not to demand the supplementary nature of a declaratory action for the affirmation of nullity consists with achievement with the purpose of administrative litigation, reasonableness from the aspect of economics of legal action, and the recent trend of the Supreme Court Decisions.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 행정소송법 제35조의 의미
Ⅲ. 무효확인소송의 소익 및 보충성에 관한 법원의 입장
Ⅳ. 무효확인소송의 소익에 관한 일본의 논의
Ⅴ. 결론에 갈음하여
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
과세처분 무효확인소송에 있어서 소의 이익
동아법학
2009 .08
-
租稅 및 負擔金의 納付와 賦課處分의 無效確認을 구할 法律上 利益 : 大法院 2008. 3. 20. 宣告 2007두6342 全員合意體判決을 中心으로
공법학연구
2009 .02
-
부작위위법확인소송의 소송요건 -대상판결: 대법원 2009.7.23. 선고 2008두10560 판결-
원광법학
2013 .01
-
주주총회결의무효 및 부존재확인판결의 효력 －소의 법적 성격과 관련하여－
경영법률
2011 .01
-
무효인 행정행위의 법적 효과
행정법연구
2020 .08
-
당사자소송 - 소송의 형태를 중심으로 -
원광법학
2010 .01
-
행정소송에서의 원고적격 : 기존 4개 학설의 의의를 중심으로
행정법연구
2008 .12
-
행정소송에서의 원고적격 : 법원의 조사방법을 중심으로
행정법연구
2009 .12
-
부당해고재심판정취소소송 판결과 해고무효확인소송 판결 간의 모순된 판단의 방지
노동법학
2010 .12
-
客觀訴訟의 법리 - 일본에서의 논의를 중심으로
원광법학
2009 .01
-
무역위원회의 판정에 대한 사법심사 가능성 소고 : 서울행정법원 2007. 8. 14. 선고 2007구합825 판결
행정법연구
2007 .08
-
행정소송에서의 기본적 사실관계 동일성의 의의 : 형사소송과의 비교를 중심으로
행정법연구
2016 .08
-
행정소송법상 법률상이익에 관한 재론
법학논총
2013 .06
-
환경행정소송에서의 원고적격
행정법연구
2011 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0