지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of the study is to make a new inquiry into meanings of the existing four theories on the standing to sue in administrative litigation of Korea. The standing to sue in administrative litigation of Korea is a difficult concept to analyze and a very complex issue which has not yet definitely resolved. So far, no definitive answer has been given to this problem.
The existing four theories have been well-known for the meaning of the standing to sue in administrative litigation of Korea prescribed by Article 12 of Administrative Litigation Act of Korea. The four theories have been introduced just in textbooks from early, but currently not all of them are actually asserted.
In addition, the four theories not only have basic problems developed by having nothing to do with the realization of the right of access to courts in the constitution of Korea, the essence, purpose, function and structure of administrative litigation and the principles of procedure of administrative litigation of Korea, but also are not systematically meaningful. Recently, however, both scholars and precedent cases are agreeing to the gradual expansion of the scope of the standing to sue in administrative litigation of Korea. Consequently, the existing four theories can be valuated that they rather emphasize one out of various sides and elements to decide the scope of standing to sue in administrative litigation than being opposed to each other theoretically on the standing to sue in administrative litigation of Korea.
In conclusion, the standing to sue in administrative litigation of Korea should be analyzed comprehensively, with the consideration of the right of access to courts in the constitution of Korea, the essence, purpose, function and structure of administrative litigation and the principles of procedure of administrative litigation of Korea.
The existing four theories have been well-known for the meaning of the standing to sue in administrative litigation of Korea prescribed by Article 12 of Administrative Litigation Act of Korea. The four theories have been introduced just in textbooks from early, but currently not all of them are actually asserted.
In addition, the four theories not only have basic problems developed by having nothing to do with the realization of the right of access to courts in the constitution of Korea, the essence, purpose, function and structure of administrative litigation and the principles of procedure of administrative litigation of Korea, but also are not systematically meaningful. Recently, however, both scholars and precedent cases are agreeing to the gradual expansion of the scope of the standing to sue in administrative litigation of Korea. Consequently, the existing four theories can be valuated that they rather emphasize one out of various sides and elements to decide the scope of standing to sue in administrative litigation than being opposed to each other theoretically on the standing to sue in administrative litigation of Korea.
In conclusion, the standing to sue in administrative litigation of Korea should be analyzed comprehensively, with the consideration of the right of access to courts in the constitution of Korea, the essence, purpose, function and structure of administrative litigation and the principles of procedure of administrative litigation of Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 기존 학설의 내용 및 평가
Ⅲ. 원고적격론의 검토 방향
Ⅳ. 결론적 고찰 - 기존 학설의 의의
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
행정소송에서의 원고적격 : 법원의 조사방법을 중심으로
행정법연구
2009 .12
-
환경행정소송에서의 원고적격
행정법연구
2011 .08
-
당사자소송 - 소송의 형태를 중심으로 -
원광법학
2010 .01
-
客觀訴訟의 법리 - 일본에서의 논의를 중심으로
원광법학
2009 .01
-
환경행정소송과 원고적격 : 대법원 2012. 7. 5. 선고 2011두13187 판결의 비판을 중심으로
한양법학
2013 .02
-
행정소송에서의 기본적 사실관계 동일성의 의의 : 형사소송과의 비교를 중심으로
행정법연구
2016 .08
-
환경행정소송에서의 원고적격
법학논총
2018 .01
-
중국 행정소송의 유형에 관한 고찰
공법학연구
2019 .05
-
미국 행정소송과 원고적격 : 법적 권리에서 사실상의 손상(injury in fact)으로
행정법연구
2014 .07
-
行政訴訟에서의 調停의 可能性과 限界
행정법연구
2007 .05
-
환경상 이익이 관련된 지역과 원고적격
행정법연구
2012 .08
-
행정소송제도의 도입과 형성
법학연구
2007 .08
-
行政訴訟에 있어서의 審理
한양법학
2004 .12
-
행정소송법 개정안의 명암
행정법연구
2013 .11
-
행정소송법 상 화해의 허용성에 관한 연구-우리나라와 일본에서의 논의에 대한 비교법적 고찰을 중심으로-
원광법학
2007 .01
-
산재보험의 사업종류변경, 보험료 부과 및 납입고지의 처분성
행정판례연구
2019 .01
-
국가기관 간의 분쟁 해결 수단으로서 항고소송의 한계
서강법률논총
2019 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0