지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
During the Goryeo dynasty period, when a child was born, a male child from the ruling class would be recorded as 'paji', and a female child from the ruling class would be recorded as 'Sosa', in the 'Hojeok' census registers. 'Paji' and 'Sosa' were no generic nouns meaning male and female children. They were mere 'designations' referring to the registered newborn children. Yet, with only those designations it was impossible to tell one from the other, so the child's name was altered after going through a certain procedure, and the revised name was put in the census register right away.
In case of the ruling class, male children were first recorded as 'Paji' and then received a revised name, so we can see that their registration upon a census register took place right after birth. Yet the names of the nobi slaves who were regarded as private property of other people, or the names of the ordinary people who were obligated to submit taxes and were therefore closely monitored by the government, and names of other low class members of the society, were recorded in the census registers with their 'own' distinguishable names (and without being recorded as either Paji or Sosa) right after birth.
In Goryeo, whenever a birth occurred, the fact of birth was instantly recorded in the census register. Such swift recognition of a birth and also a spontaneous recording system show us that the dynasty's governing was functioning at the most final and yet ultimately primary administrative level, and they also show us that the changes which were happening at the household levels were being spontaneously monitored and addressed with. Whenever a change in the family household took place, the head of the family was obligated to report it to the authorities, and have it recorded in the census register. And the Ijeong figures in charge of the villages' administration were also under orders to confirm and record those household changes, including the birth of a newborn child, in the official census registers.
The people in charge of the village administrations instantly found out such changes which were happening at the household levels, and recorded them in the census registers. Every Gun and Hyeon unit collected the census registers filed by the villages, every year. It also seems that the central government ordered revisions of the census registers once in every three years, and put them in custody of the Minbu office.
In case of the ruling class, male children were first recorded as 'Paji' and then received a revised name, so we can see that their registration upon a census register took place right after birth. Yet the names of the nobi slaves who were regarded as private property of other people, or the names of the ordinary people who were obligated to submit taxes and were therefore closely monitored by the government, and names of other low class members of the society, were recorded in the census registers with their 'own' distinguishable names (and without being recorded as either Paji or Sosa) right after birth.
In Goryeo, whenever a birth occurred, the fact of birth was instantly recorded in the census register. Such swift recognition of a birth and also a spontaneous recording system show us that the dynasty's governing was functioning at the most final and yet ultimately primary administrative level, and they also show us that the changes which were happening at the household levels were being spontaneously monitored and addressed with. Whenever a change in the family household took place, the head of the family was obligated to report it to the authorities, and have it recorded in the census register. And the Ijeong figures in charge of the villages' administration were also under orders to confirm and record those household changes, including the birth of a newborn child, in the official census registers.
The people in charge of the village administrations instantly found out such changes which were happening at the household levels, and recorded them in the census registers. Every Gun and Hyeon unit collected the census registers filed by the villages, every year. It also seems that the central government ordered revisions of the census registers once in every three years, and put them in custody of the Minbu office.
목차
머리말
1. 호적 자료에 나타난 출생자
2. 출생과 호적에의 등재
3. 국가의 출생자 파악과 등록
맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
現存 16·17세기 호적대장의 특징들과 新발견 1666년도‘濟州牧丙午式戶籍大帳’ 斷片
古文書硏究
2005 .01
-
조선후기 사회변동과 호적대장 연구의 과제
역사와현실
2006 .12
-
Population Census, 1970
Korea Journal
1971 .02
-
논문-조선후기 호적대장의 여성호칭 규정과 성격-단성호적을 중심으로
역사와현실
2003 .06
-
18-19세기 노비 호구수 변화 양상에 대한 재검토 : 호적대장을 바라보는 새로운 시각
역사민속학
2017 .06
-
일제시기 民籍簿의 작성과 女性戶主의 성격 ―19세기 濟州 戶籍中草, 光武戶籍과의 비교를 중심으로
대동문화연구
2007 .01
-
17-19세기 여성의 지칭어 변화 : 『단성호적대장』을 중심으로
민족문화연구
2013 .01
-
광무 연간의 호구조사, 그 연속과 변화
역사와경계
2014 .09
-
조선후기 호적에 대한 이해 : 논쟁과 과제
한국사연구
2014 .06
-
제주도 호적 작성 원칙 “無一漏戶 無一漏名”에 대한 고찰
대동문화연구
2013 .01
-
광무 연간 북한 지역 여성의 호적 기재 양상
역사민속학
2016 .12
-
조선 후기 호적, 호구의 성격과 새로운 쟁점
한국사연구
2006 .12
-
번역 텍스트의 언어 사용역(Register) 연구
번역학연구
2004 .03
-
조선왕조의 戶籍과 통치체계
동양사학연구
2015 .06
-
朝鮮朝後期 丹城縣戶籍帳籍에 關하여(Ⅱ)
코기토
1978 .12
-
일본식 근대호적기술의 전개과정과 이에(家) 및 이에제도
日本思想
2010 .01
-
조선후기 국가의 賤人여성 파악실태와 편제방식 ― '단성현호적대장'의 ‘婢’ 기재양상을 중심으로
대동문화연구
2005 .01
-
18세기 丹城縣 官奴婢의 존재양태
한국사연구
2005 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0