지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
On the revised proposal of Commercial Law notified beforehand in May 2008 by the Ministry of Justice, the corporate opportunity doctrine is codified under § 398 (transaction between director and corporation) of Korean Commercial Law, and the proposal places the test of corporate opportunity under the subsection of § 398.
This article presents the resonable construction of law when the corporate opportunity doctrine comes to be codified on Korean Commercial Law and some problems of the revised proposal and improvement through the concrete consideration of the theories and the leading case in the US.
As the corporate opportunity doctrine has come to be settled down as case law in various states of the US and has been developed with many discussions to apply the theory properly, we have to consider that the corporate opportunity doctrine is the theory which is fully verified. However there are various kinds of business and circumstances of corporation, it may be true that we have some difficulties to make a rule perfectly and this area is closely connected with a factual question to be decided by resonable inferences from objective facts.
This article describes. in the part Ⅱ, the concept of the corporate opportunity doctrine. This part introduces the leading case and important theories on the corporate opportunity and describes the relations between the duty of loyalty, the duty of prohibition from competitive business and transaction between director and corporation. And it describes the test of corporate opportunity on Guth case and ALI principles of corporate governance etc.
And part Ⅲ describes the defenses for the director and the officer. This part examines the criteria and definition of the defenses including the per-mission by the board or stockholders.
Part Ⅳ studies the 2008 revised proposal of Commercial Law notified by the Ministry of Justice. Because the corporate opportunity doctrine is codified under § 398 (transaction between director and corporation) of Korean Commercial Law, this article presents that the corporate opportunity doc-trine may be placed as a independent clause or under the clause of competitive business prohibition because it is closely related to competitive business. Part Ⅴ describes the conclusion.
This article presents the resonable construction of law when the corporate opportunity doctrine comes to be codified on Korean Commercial Law and some problems of the revised proposal and improvement through the concrete consideration of the theories and the leading case in the US.
As the corporate opportunity doctrine has come to be settled down as case law in various states of the US and has been developed with many discussions to apply the theory properly, we have to consider that the corporate opportunity doctrine is the theory which is fully verified. However there are various kinds of business and circumstances of corporation, it may be true that we have some difficulties to make a rule perfectly and this area is closely connected with a factual question to be decided by resonable inferences from objective facts.
This article describes. in the part Ⅱ, the concept of the corporate opportunity doctrine. This part introduces the leading case and important theories on the corporate opportunity and describes the relations between the duty of loyalty, the duty of prohibition from competitive business and transaction between director and corporation. And it describes the test of corporate opportunity on Guth case and ALI principles of corporate governance etc.
And part Ⅲ describes the defenses for the director and the officer. This part examines the criteria and definition of the defenses including the per-mission by the board or stockholders.
Part Ⅳ studies the 2008 revised proposal of Commercial Law notified by the Ministry of Justice. Because the corporate opportunity doctrine is codified under § 398 (transaction between director and corporation) of Korean Commercial Law, this article presents that the corporate opportunity doc-trine may be placed as a independent clause or under the clause of competitive business prohibition because it is closely related to competitive business. Part Ⅴ describes the conclusion.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 회사기회이론의 개념
Ⅲ. 회사기회의 인정기준
Ⅳ. 이사 등 수임인의 면책사유
Ⅴ. 개정법률안의 검토
Ⅵ. 결론
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
회사의 사업기회를 유용한 이사의 자기거래의 금지 : 개정상법안제398조제(3)항의 법리 구성 및 입법론적 검토
동아법학
2008 .08
-
회사기회유용의 적용요건과 입법에 대한 검토
비교사법
2010 .06
-
회사기회유용금지의 법리 : 미국 법원들의 중요 고려요건과 그 적용가능성
기업법연구
2007 .09
-
개정상법상 회사기회유용금지규정의 검토
한양법학
2011 .05
-
회사기회법리에 관한 고찰
법학논총
2009 .02
-
현행 상법상 회사기회유용금지 규정에 관한 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구
기업법연구
2016 .09
-
회사기회의 유용 및 자기거래 규제에 따른 실무적 현안과 법적 과제
기업법연구
2011 .12
-
회사기회유용금지의 법리
경영법률
2007 .01
-
2006년 會社法改正案의 論點
기업법연구
2006 .12
-
회사기회유용의 법리와 상법 제397조의2
경영법률
2013 .01
-
주식회사 기관제도의 개선방향에 관한 연구 -상법 개정안을 중심으로-
일감법학
2010 .01
-
자기거래 대상과 그 유형의 확대에 대한 소고
일감법학
2012 .01
-
개정상법상 회사기회 유용금지 조항에 관한 소고 － 경제민주화 논의와 관련하여 －
경영법률
2013 .01
-
사업기회유용 금지의무 위반의 효과 : 이사회 승인을 중심으로
기업법연구
2014 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0