지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyse the constraints and meanings of past perfect and present perfect in discourse. To achieve this purpose, the temporal structure in discourse, the new information constraint, the adjacency constraint, and the internal structure of event time are proposed. Furthermore, the theoretical validity of the proposals in discourse is testified.
The proposals of this study are as follows:
(1) The New Information Constraint:
Each new main clause in a discourse must contain new relationships among events under a common topic.
(2) The Adjacency Constraint :
The relationships between two events entered as adjacent under a common topic cannot be broken through the later insertion of a third event in the past perfect.
(3) The Internal Structure of Event Time
〈이미지 참조〉
It is argued that the proposed rules can solve the difficulty in analysing the acceptability and meanings of past perfect and present perfect in discourse. In this study, the constraints of using perfects in discourse should be revised and the meanings on the ambiguity of perfects should be interpreted through the internal structure of the event time.
The proposals of this study are as follows:
(1) The New Information Constraint:
Each new main clause in a discourse must contain new relationships among events under a common topic.
(2) The Adjacency Constraint :
The relationships between two events entered as adjacent under a common topic cannot be broken through the later insertion of a third event in the past perfect.
(3) The Internal Structure of Event Time
〈이미지 참조〉
It is argued that the proposed rules can solve the difficulty in analysing the acceptability and meanings of past perfect and present perfect in discourse. In this study, the constraints of using perfects in discourse should be revised and the meanings on the ambiguity of perfects should be interpreted through the internal structure of the event time.
목차
1. 서론
2. 담화시간구조
3. 완료시제 사용의 제약
4. 담화에서의 완료시제 의미
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Everything is perfect !
고문화
2004 .01
-
A Diachronic Study of English BE Perfect Relics
영어영문학연구
2018 .01
-
A Perfect Meeting
Korea Journal
1992 .12
-
A Constraint on Constraints
음성음운형태론연구
1999 .12
-
On the Grammaticalization of the English Have Perfect Based on Diachronic Bible Versions
영어영문학연구
2012 .01
-
담화 단위와 의미
한국어학
2017 .11
-
On the Demise of the English Be Perfect Based on Diachronic Bible Versions
영어영문학연구
2013 .01
-
담화유형별 선호 논항 구조
담화와인지
2005 .12
-
“Syntactic Aspects of English Present Perfect”
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .12
-
The Invariant Meaning of the Perfect Form in English
언어
1984 .06
-
Discourse Functions of New-this
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2004 .04
-
아랍어 완료형과 미완료형의 의미 연구 - 코란 구절을 바탕으로 -
아랍어와 아랍문학
2009 .01
-
Three Current Topics in Discourse
언어
1981 .06
-
토론에 나타난 대응쌍 연구
담화와인지
2003 .12
-
근대국어 과거 시제 ‘-엇-’의 담화 내의 기능 : 청학서 〈삼역총해〉의 대역을 중심으로
언어학
2018 .08
-
The English Resultative and Experiential Perfects : A Reply to Mittwoch (2008)
언어
2011 .03
-
‘었’의 현재완료 상 의미와 단순과거 시제 의미의 관계 : 염재일(2010a)에 대하여
담화와인지
2012 .08
-
A Discourse Constraint on Infinitival Complement of 'Want'
언어
1990 .12
-
만주국 시기 조선인 이민담론의 시론적 고찰 : 조선일보 사설을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2011 .03
-
Some Thoughts on Discourse
영어영문학
2001 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0