지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korean morpheme ess has been analysed as a past tense marker, a perfect aspect marker, both, or neither. Although all of them agree that it is used to convey both the past event and its present result state aspect, they have different accounts of which is the meaning of the morpheme and which is the implication of it. In this paper, we attempt to explore the meaning relations between the past event and the present result state conveyed by ess, replying to Yeom (2010a), along with his other works (2010b, 2012). He argues that ess is ambiguous between past tense and present perfect and thus one cannot be derived from the other. He continues that the present result state presupposes the past event and the past event entails the present result state. We examine his claims closely and conclude that they are not correct. Rather the present result state entails the past event and the past event R-implicates the present result state. In this paper, we only clarify their meaning relations, without explicitly supporting any of the existing theories of the meaning of ess, but these clarifications may shed light on the meaning of the morpheme ess.
목차
1. 서론
2. 함의, 전제, 그리고 두 가지 함축
3. 현재의 결과 상태와 과거 사건
4. 과거 사건과 현재의 결과 상태
5. ‘었’은 중의적인가?
6. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-701-003204074