메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집 東北亞細亞文化學會 第16回 國際學術大會
발행연도
2008.4
수록면
189 - 192 (4page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The countries of the East Asia of these days have trouble about a problem of the history. As for me, it is thought the cause to be because I interpret ancient history through historical view of a one-country-one-nation in a race and national modem times. The principle of Japanese colonist historical view who was formed in the accommodation period of the modem historical study to understand even a "New history textbook" problem yet has an influence on the history recognition of the japanese citizen.
It may be said that there are the problems of such a historical view at a point succeeded to as education by not only some historians and the intellectual but also a general Japanese citizen. In late years, in Japanese society, the submission of the recognition problem called the negation of the own country history by the compulsion of another person is the proof history education after the defeat. However, according to what was not able to understand recognition structure of the double that was inherent in Korea and Japanese ancient history, I may say such a historical view. Therefore, I am going to clarify the point that there is for recognition structure of double with Korea and Japan in the crooked ancient times when an image and ancient history education were made with the next announcement under the historical study construction and the name of the rationalism to say in modern times at the beginning in refraction and the 20th century of the recognition of the history of outskirts relations by the Yamato sovereignty in the eighth century in history with Korea and Japan in the Japanese ancient times, and there is the purpose.
I am as follows when I give some conclusions that I confirmed through the above-mentioned examination.
Primarily the fact that Empire sense of history is inherent in for double in ancient Korea in japan and the formation and the development of the Japanese relations history in legal codes sense of history and modern times in the ancient times and recognition of two these are points that it is linked each other.
The second indication is that there is sense of history in the wrong modern times when it was performed to rationalize the Korea merger in the colony times in the interpretation of the ancient Korea and Japan-affiliated history. In addition, ancient Korea and the distortion at the starting point of the history of Japanese relations formed in conjunction with it are the points that there was.
The third indication can point out the contrariety of historical view mainly on the Yamato sovereignty and consecutive sense of history. As a result of having taken the history education of the modem Japanese Emperor system of japan nation not the history as the historical fact, these historical view is points to be a virtual image made by the influence.

목차

1. 序論
2. 古代韓日?係史の問題点
3. 《日本書紀》の古代韓日?係史の認識
4. 近代日本史?者の古代韓日?係史についての認識
5. 結論
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0