지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis is to make an analysis of the meaning of the ‘subjecthood’ appeared on the novels by Kim Seung-ok taking notice of the personality, subjecthood, and the self called ‘Self-world’ in connection with the spirit of the times in 1960s.
As『The Age in Prose』has the interrelationships with the reflective discourse of the modern planning in 1960s, we know that his five works are connected with the gist of a discourse properly. As it were, the characters in his novels face up to the two faces of the capital modernization in 1960s, but they are forced to the problems of choice caused by the opposition with ‘survival’ and ‘real life’ at that time. They fall into a dilemma in new lives in the new age. He struggled to free himself from surviving to adapt himself to the modernization, but in the long run, he could not adapt himself to new circumstances. And he assumed a critical attitude toward realistic negation and contradictory concept created by formulating estranged subjecthood.
However on this subjecthood showing adoptive reactions on the experience of modernization, the existing studies claim that they are egocentric and a thing in a personal limit. And ‘Self-world’ in his novels is very closed and isolated characteristic, so to speak, it is ‘logical limping’ and unsubstantial form (idealogical form). However the subjecthood in his novels is, as the selfreflective subjecthood, critical cognitive faculty on the modern experience, it has a deep meaning facing the real form of modern subjecthood caused social negation at that time.
This self-cognitive subjecthood can not design the world to its heart’s content, it is not also passive subjecthood like fish-shaped bread by the structures and systems. The figure in the self-reflective subjecthood embarrassing its humble civic feeling against the unfair actuality in his novels expect the practical subjecthood, and it has the present state, it is also our own looks bringing up the personal and social problems.
As『The Age in Prose』has the interrelationships with the reflective discourse of the modern planning in 1960s, we know that his five works are connected with the gist of a discourse properly. As it were, the characters in his novels face up to the two faces of the capital modernization in 1960s, but they are forced to the problems of choice caused by the opposition with ‘survival’ and ‘real life’ at that time. They fall into a dilemma in new lives in the new age. He struggled to free himself from surviving to adapt himself to the modernization, but in the long run, he could not adapt himself to new circumstances. And he assumed a critical attitude toward realistic negation and contradictory concept created by formulating estranged subjecthood.
However on this subjecthood showing adoptive reactions on the experience of modernization, the existing studies claim that they are egocentric and a thing in a personal limit. And ‘Self-world’ in his novels is very closed and isolated characteristic, so to speak, it is ‘logical limping’ and unsubstantial form (idealogical form). However the subjecthood in his novels is, as the selfreflective subjecthood, critical cognitive faculty on the modern experience, it has a deep meaning facing the real form of modern subjecthood caused social negation at that time.
This self-cognitive subjecthood can not design the world to its heart’s content, it is not also passive subjecthood like fish-shaped bread by the structures and systems. The figure in the self-reflective subjecthood embarrassing its humble civic feeling against the unfair actuality in his novels expect the practical subjecthood, and it has the present state, it is also our own looks bringing up the personal and social problems.
목차
1. 서론
2. 1960년대 현대화 기획과 반성적인 담론
3. ‘자기 세계’에 대한 모색- 근대에 ‘적응’하는 주체
4. 현실과 주체의 균열- 근대를 ‘성찰’하는 주체
5. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Subjecthood Tests in Korean
어학연구
1994 .03
-
국어 성상형용사 구문의 주제어와 주어성 검증기제
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
중국어 한글표기법 논의를 바라보는 한 시각 : 왜 ‘원음주의’인가
중국어문학논집
2009 .10
-
타자성의 극복, 주체 확립의 길
현대소설연구
2001 .12
-
주어와 관련된 몇 가지 문제
언어과학연구
2007 .12
-
근대국어의 주어성 ‘NP로셔’ 구문에 대하여
어문연구(語文硏究)
2017 .01
-
러시아어의 주어성 연구: 주어-동사 일치의 문제
외국학연구
2014 .01
-
주절과 전제된 종속절에서의 한국어 조사 -이/가
언어학 연구
2015 .10
-
해방전 일본을 통한 서양사회사상의 수용과정에 관한 연구
한국민족문화
2000 .12
-
동아시아 유학의 근현대 굴절양상 : 조선 유학을 중심으로
국학연구
2004 .06
-
중국 한자어 원지음 표기의 문제점
대동문화연구
2011 .01
-
나옹혜근의 선사상에 대한 철학적 분석
대각사상
2008 .01
-
신여성의 식민 체험과 자전적 소설 연구-나혜석, 강경애를 중심으로
동악어문학
2004 .08
-
Impersonal Constructions in Old English: A Semantic Relation Approach
영어학연구
2005 .01
-
이상의 소설 〈날개〉로 보는 관계정신분석
연세상담코칭연구
2020 .03
-
이주노동자 소설에 나타난 타자 윤리 연구
인문학논총
2017 .10
-
가부장적 구조 속에서 본 타자화된 여성
철학논총
2010 .01
-
슬라브어의 생략과 화제, 테마, 주어: 러시아어, 폴란드어, 체코어, 불가리아어 문어텍스트 분석
러시아어문학연구논집
2013 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-810-001403691