지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2001.12
- 수록면
- 131 - 155 (25page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The mutual interactions in East Asia during the 17th-18th centuries has an important art historical significance in Chos?n ceramics.
Firstly. there is little evidence, except for a wide foot rim. that can prove the mutual interactions between Chos?n and China ceramics during the 17th century, because Chos?n was reluctant to receive the Chinese style and technique. due to the hostility of Chos?n to the Qing China after the war. In the 18th century newly changed situation made the influx of Chinese styles prominent in Chos?n. Chos?n scholars who emerged the major consumers of Chos?n porcelain began to recognize Qing culture and import the Chinese ceramic style. The use of the cartoon in painting themes and motifs, the appearance of landscape motifs. popularity of auspicious and flower-insects motifs, angular shape and Chinese-style decoration are good examples. But Chos?n did not simply borrow the decoration type from China. The theme and representation were changed to satisfy the Chos?n consumers' taste. The popularity of the "Eight scenes of the Xiao and Xiang Rivers 瀟湘八景," Chos?n-style flower motifs, designs with wide space, simple decoration, and peculiar official kiln system were the characteristic Chos?n-style different from the Chinese style.
Secondly, even though there were material and personal exchanges in ceramics, the exchange was solely one-sided from the Chos?n to Japan. Despite the invasion of Japan in 1592-1597, Chos?n showed kindness to .Iapan: Chos?n made tea bowls specially ordered from Japan in Woegwan 倭館 (special place for trade with Japan) from 1649 to 1710. For Chos?n it was a difficult and even burdensome job to make ceramic ware for the export to Japan because this required skillful potters and clay. In the 18th century. Japanese began to order Japanese-style ceramics. However the situation gradually changed. Chos?n potters kidnapped during the Japanese invasion taught the technique to .Japanese, and they made the first porcelain in Japanese ceramic history. In the middle of the 17th century Japanese began to export ceramics to Europe and received the Chinese style and technique actively. Thus in the 18th century Japan did not import Chos?n-style ceramics any more. On the contrary a group of Chos?n scholars called Pukhakp'a 北學派 which insisted on the urgent import of Qing culture and demanded the change of the ideas and systems of commerce. envied the Japanese respect toward ceramic skill.
Thirdly, Chos?n did not import the advanced Chinese production technique, while Japan tried to adopt various technique from Chos?n and China. The imported technique had become fundamental basis for Japanese porcelain technique. They also took the overglaze decoration from China and developed their own production technique. For Japan the export of ceramics to Europe and other Asian countries stimulated its production further. They could surpass the Chos?n in production technique. As for Chos?n there is no evidence that they produced over-glaze ceramics and improve their kiln system.
Finally. we have to note that the cultural golden age of the East Asia during the 17th 18th century was possible through the active interactions. The appearance of literary scholars as the main consumers of ceramics and the taste of aesthetic patron affected the porcelain style. The landscape motifs. the poetic description on porcelain and the increase of stationary production were common. The identical taste of consumers in these country had great influence on the mutual interaction.
Firstly. there is little evidence, except for a wide foot rim. that can prove the mutual interactions between Chos?n and China ceramics during the 17th century, because Chos?n was reluctant to receive the Chinese style and technique. due to the hostility of Chos?n to the Qing China after the war. In the 18th century newly changed situation made the influx of Chinese styles prominent in Chos?n. Chos?n scholars who emerged the major consumers of Chos?n porcelain began to recognize Qing culture and import the Chinese ceramic style. The use of the cartoon in painting themes and motifs, the appearance of landscape motifs. popularity of auspicious and flower-insects motifs, angular shape and Chinese-style decoration are good examples. But Chos?n did not simply borrow the decoration type from China. The theme and representation were changed to satisfy the Chos?n consumers' taste. The popularity of the "Eight scenes of the Xiao and Xiang Rivers 瀟湘八景," Chos?n-style flower motifs, designs with wide space, simple decoration, and peculiar official kiln system were the characteristic Chos?n-style different from the Chinese style.
Secondly, even though there were material and personal exchanges in ceramics, the exchange was solely one-sided from the Chos?n to Japan. Despite the invasion of Japan in 1592-1597, Chos?n showed kindness to .Iapan: Chos?n made tea bowls specially ordered from Japan in Woegwan 倭館 (special place for trade with Japan) from 1649 to 1710. For Chos?n it was a difficult and even burdensome job to make ceramic ware for the export to Japan because this required skillful potters and clay. In the 18th century. Japanese began to order Japanese-style ceramics. However the situation gradually changed. Chos?n potters kidnapped during the Japanese invasion taught the technique to .Japanese, and they made the first porcelain in Japanese ceramic history. In the middle of the 17th century Japanese began to export ceramics to Europe and received the Chinese style and technique actively. Thus in the 18th century Japan did not import Chos?n-style ceramics any more. On the contrary a group of Chos?n scholars called Pukhakp'a 北學派 which insisted on the urgent import of Qing culture and demanded the change of the ideas and systems of commerce. envied the Japanese respect toward ceramic skill.
Thirdly, Chos?n did not import the advanced Chinese production technique, while Japan tried to adopt various technique from Chos?n and China. The imported technique had become fundamental basis for Japanese porcelain technique. They also took the overglaze decoration from China and developed their own production technique. For Japan the export of ceramics to Europe and other Asian countries stimulated its production further. They could surpass the Chos?n in production technique. As for Chos?n there is no evidence that they produced over-glaze ceramics and improve their kiln system.
Finally. we have to note that the cultural golden age of the East Asia during the 17th 18th century was possible through the active interactions. The appearance of literary scholars as the main consumers of ceramics and the taste of aesthetic patron affected the porcelain style. The landscape motifs. the poetic description on porcelain and the increase of stationary production were common. The identical taste of consumers in these country had great influence on the mutual interaction.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 17세기
Ⅲ. 18세기
Ⅳ. 맺음말 - 도자 교류의 미술사적 의의
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선왕조가 가꾼 기록유산의 꽃, 의궤(儀軌): 譯註己巳進表裏進饌儀軌 서울: 국립국악원, 2018.
국악원논문집
2018 .01
-
18ㆍ19세기 日本 磁器의 유입과 전개양상
미술사논단
2009 .12
-
楚亭 朴齊家ㆍ綸菴 李喜經의 도자 인식
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2003 .09
-
朝鮮 後期 白磁의 製作技術 硏究
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
1997 .06
-
韓國建築史硏究 30年 : 朝鮮~近代
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
1990 .12
-
근대 유럽에서 한국도자에 대한 인식 변화와 그 배경
한국근현대미술사학
2018 .12
-
朝鮮時代 後期 白磁의 새로운 傾向
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
1989 .09
-
한국 도자사 연구 어떻게 할 것인가
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2004 .03
-
朝鮮時代 漁父圖에 대한 硏究
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2001 .06
-
조선왕조 중기 회화의 제 양상
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
1997 .03
-
도자사와 교재
미술사학
2005 .08
-
朝鮮後期 繪畵에 미친 中國의 영향
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
1995 .06
-
朝鮮初期의 工藝政策과 그 理念
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
1992 .09
-
디지털기법을 활용한 세라믹 내외장재 연구 및 디자인센터 실내공간 분석
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .10
-
1930년대 『每日申報』에 표출된 도자정책의 시기적 쟁점
한국근현대미술사학
2018 .07
-
朝鮮時代 『佛說八關齋戒秘密求生淨土心要』의 十王版畫
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
1994 .03
-
한국 산업자기의 발전방안 연구
한국디자인문화학회지
2008 .09
-
1960 년대 이후 미국의 구상적 도자조각 표현양식에 관한 연구
한국디자인문화학회지
2001 .06
-
국내도자산업 진흥을 위한 디자인 경영전략 연구
한국디자인문화학회지
2008 .12
-
朝鮮美術展覽會 制度에 관한 硏究
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
1995 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-609-016481507