메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
신영어영문학회 신영어영문학 신영어영문학 제18집
발행연도
2001.2
수록면
119 - 133 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Thackeray's Vanity Fair has evoked many different critical responses, especially, regarding its narrator. Many critics who follow Henry James' art of fiction have been troubled with the intrusive narrator, but some critics such as Wayne Booth have recognized the value of an intrusive narrator and argued that the use of an intrusive narrator is most appropriate in the dramatic context of Vanity Fair.
In this paper, I attempt to push Booth's argument a little further and maintain that this narrator is in fact the best example of the clown-masked narrator which Bakhtin sees as one of the literary sources that have made a profound impact upon European literature. A clown can take on the mask of anybody with no responsibility for his words and actions. He can filter through himself the values of people or disclose their falsity or hypocrisy. In the meantime, as a narrator, he does not have to feel responsible for his narrative. For this reason, Bakhtin argues that a clown as a narrator can maintain an appropriate distance from the narrative and the dialogic relationships of all people including himself.
The narrator of Vanity Fair is a clown, a mask of the author, whose reflections of characters and the author mock them and show their vanity. What's more noticeable is that he himself contradicts himself, which suggests that the clown as a narrator is also vain just like any character in the novel. For this reason, all perspectives of characters, the author, or even the reader are in dialogical relations, with no one perspective being subjected to another. No one single perspective or idea has the absolute value of goodness or badness, for we, or our perspectives, are all equally independent and continuously in dialogue.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-016410687