메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제53권 제1호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
63 - 85 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to analyze Hamlet’s role-playing from the perspective of stage clowns’ traditions in Shakespearean theatre. First of all, I propose three kinds of Shakespearean clowns: professional actor- clowns, mock-clowns and clownlike role-playing. In Shakespeare’s comedies, clowns, or often called as a fool, are a kind of theatrical device to encourage the festivity and dynamics of the play or its performance, crossing the boundary between the stage and the audience. They are like a critical advisor within the play, while communicating directly with audience as an interpreter or a mediator like Greek chorus. Shakespeare’s tragedies are no exception. In Hamlet, it is Hamlet himself who plays a role of a clown by putting an antic disposition on. His mask allows him to enjoy the liminal freedom of playing at the area of platea, where he can view his world from a distance and closely connect with audience as a clown does. Hamlet also leads other characters, such as Polonius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, to share his role of clowning. They function as mock-clowns, unconsciously sharing Hamlet’s clowning for the effect of comic relief. In addition, Hamlet continuously prepares for his final goal of revenge on Claudius in his main plot through this comically metaphoric subplot playing with his mock-clowns. Therefore, Hamlet’s clowning strategy accomplishes Shakespearean theatrical rhythm which mutually complements tragic seriousness and comic playfulness.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0