지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There is little proof about which power groups supported the resistance of Emperor Go-jong against the plunge of the state power by Japanese imperialism, and how it was realized. There is also little illumination about how the bureaucracy and Confucian scholars, which were of noble birth and had often uncomfortable relationships with the imperial power, understood the 1905 Convention, and which countermeasures they took.
There were diverse and confusing understandings and countermeasures against the Eulsa Agreement among people in those days. There were mainly claims about national decay and sorrowful indignation, which made an appeal to national susceptibility. There were also other claims, which resorted to suicide, uprising of an army in the cause of justice, intervention of the world powers, and filing of lawsuit. It was remarkable that there was a gap of understanding of the situation among the Emperor, the Royalists, and the Cabinet in the government.
The paper will examine how Emperor Go-jong, the Royalists, and the bureaucrats understood the situation after the 1905 Convention, and how each group took countermeasures since the Russo-Japanes War. It will focus on how they understood the effects of the 1905 Convention, and the status of the international law for the Protectorate treaty of Japan in 1905.
Countermeasures of Emperor Go-jong and the Royalists, which lead to the abdication of Emperor Go-jong after the dispatch of special envoy to the Hague, were related with diplomatic settlement. The bureaucracy, whose influences were shrinked by the reinforcement of the imperial power, and which was dissatisfied with the despotism of the Royalists, advocated an alliance between the Great Han Empire and Japan, and committed suicide to make a protest against the 1905 Convention. However, most of bureaucrats and Confucian scholars, except some high-ranking officials, came close to Emperor Go-jong’s understanding of the situation. The paper will clarify whether there was a common way of thinking among Emperor Go-jong, the Royalists, and the bureaucracy.
There were diverse and confusing understandings and countermeasures against the Eulsa Agreement among people in those days. There were mainly claims about national decay and sorrowful indignation, which made an appeal to national susceptibility. There were also other claims, which resorted to suicide, uprising of an army in the cause of justice, intervention of the world powers, and filing of lawsuit. It was remarkable that there was a gap of understanding of the situation among the Emperor, the Royalists, and the Cabinet in the government.
The paper will examine how Emperor Go-jong, the Royalists, and the bureaucrats understood the situation after the 1905 Convention, and how each group took countermeasures since the Russo-Japanes War. It will focus on how they understood the effects of the 1905 Convention, and the status of the international law for the Protectorate treaty of Japan in 1905.
Countermeasures of Emperor Go-jong and the Royalists, which lead to the abdication of Emperor Go-jong after the dispatch of special envoy to the Hague, were related with diplomatic settlement. The bureaucracy, whose influences were shrinked by the reinforcement of the imperial power, and which was dissatisfied with the despotism of the Royalists, advocated an alliance between the Great Han Empire and Japan, and committed suicide to make a protest against the 1905 Convention. However, most of bureaucrats and Confucian scholars, except some high-ranking officials, came close to Emperor Go-jong’s understanding of the situation. The paper will clarify whether there was a common way of thinking among Emperor Go-jong, the Royalists, and the bureaucracy.
목차
머리말
1. 고종 및 근왕세력의 정세인식과 밀사 외교
2. 관료세력의 상소운동과 조약파기의 논리
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1905년 「保護條約」에 대한 高宗皇帝의 協商指示說 批判
역사학보
2005 .03
-
제2차 헤이그 평화회의(1907)와 대한제국 언론의 세계인식 : 『皇城新聞』과 『大韓每日申報』를 중심으로
한국사학보
2008 .02
-
대한제국의 생존전략과 '을사조약'
역사학보
2005 .12
-
19세기 후반 한ㆍ일 궁중의 후계자 교육 비교연구 : 純宗 황제와 明治 천황이 받은 후계자 교육을 중심으로
한일관계사연구
2012 .12
-
고려 무인정권기 명종의 현실인식과 정치운영
한국사연구
2015 .03
-
일제강점기 초등교과서에 표상된 明治天皇 : 조선총독부 편찬 ‘역사교과서’를 중심으로
일어일문학
2017 .05
-
로마 제국과 일제의 통치자 숭배 비교 연구 : 기독교와 관련하여
한국기독교신학논총
2013 .04
-
을사조약은 어떻게 기억되어 왔는가?
역사와현실
2007 .12
-
唐 후기 皇位 繼承의 樣相과 宣宗의 즉위 -長子 명분을 중심으로
중국사연구
2019 .01
-
康熙帝의 淸 帝國 구상과 滿洲族의 정체성 : 예수회 선교사들의 기록을 중심으로
역사학보
2007 .12
-
근대 중국의 國祖 認識과 민족문제
동북아역사논총
2008 .06
-
淸 중기 總理事務王大臣 체제와 정국운영
동양사학연구
2013 .09
-
1907년 헤이그 평화회의의 개최과정과 성격
한국독립운동사연구
2007 .12
-
일본 고대국가에서 ‘化’의 개념
동양사학연구
2000 .04
-
무인정권, 그리고 전란 속의 왕권 : 고려 고종(1192-1259) 연구
한국인물사연구
2009 .09
-
로마 군대 황제의례의 성격연구
대구사학
2013 .01
-
제국 일본의 엽서 - 강제늑약 및 천황과 전쟁을 중심으로
아시아문화연구
2019 .12
-
唐詩 속 漢武帝 형상에 반영된 皇帝에 대한 비판적 인식
중국어문학논집
2015 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-016210201