지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The trade of Tianjin before and after periods of the World War I had rapidly growing. As a result, Tianjin had become the first trading port in Huabei areas. Tianjin’s trade and economy at this periods had changed the composition of trade goods, comparing with that of the former periods. The economy and trade of Tianjin had changed in quality. Through the development of the modern industry, the export material had changed from the raw material to the industrial products. Huabei peasantry had been subordinated to the world economy through the export of new product, that is, cotton. Especially, Japan had monopolized a import of the cotton. Moreover, Japanese had the Huabei peasantry cultivate cotton in order to secure the supply of raw materials in their country. Japan had invaded Huabei in order to secure their raw materials. In this periods, the importing articles had mainly consisted of the consumer goods. The feature in that period was the increase of importing food. The import foods were largely consisted of rice and wheat flour. The importing demand of the food had increased because of the growth of Tianjin city. The import of cheap wheat flour had inflicted injury on the wheat's sales, which was an important source of income of Huabei peasantry. The import of Japan’s cotton was very important in the importing aspects. Before and after periods of the World War I, Japan had hold on the Tianjin cotton market, defeating UK. At the middle of 1920, the development of the China Cotton industry and the diffusion of new technology had threaten the market of Japan’s cotton. In 1930’s, the proportion of Japan’s cotton had decreased less than 10%.
Finally, the monopoly position of Japan had increased in both import and export. However, it is not true that Japan had constituted ‘Trade Sphere of Asia’, which Japan had dominated. The position of Japan had substituted for that of UK in a Tianjin market. Therefore, Japan had invaded Huabei areas including ManJu in order to reinforce the monopoly position. In addition. Japan had attempted to reorganize the structure of the East Asian trade, through the Sino-Japanese War.
Finally, the monopoly position of Japan had increased in both import and export. However, it is not true that Japan had constituted ‘Trade Sphere of Asia’, which Japan had dominated. The position of Japan had substituted for that of UK in a Tianjin market. Therefore, Japan had invaded Huabei areas including ManJu in order to reinforce the monopoly position. In addition. Japan had attempted to reorganize the structure of the East Asian trade, through the Sino-Japanese War.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 텐진 무역의 발전의 추세와 특징
Ⅲ. 텐진무역의 일본 집중과 수출 상품구조의 변화
Ⅳ. 텐진 수입무역의 구조 변화와 일본
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제1차 세계대전 이후 조선의 무역추이와 무역품목
아세아연구
2007 .12
-
외국인 및 한국인 직접투자의 도시경제 파급효과에 관한 연구 : 중국 천진(天津)시를 중심으로
중국과 중국학
2008 .08
-
한일 무역구조 및 개선방안에 관한 연구
한국사회과학연구
2004 .12
-
중국 톈진 지역 물류산업 현황과 활성화 방안
무역연구
2015 .01
-
미․중․일 3국에 대한 수입 상위 20품목의 위상과 그 실태 분석(1995-2010년)
한일경상논집
2011 .01
-
대일무역에서 소재 및 부품산업의 경쟁력 실태에관한 실증분석
무역연구
2013 .01
-
한ㆍ일간 수출입구조분석을 통한 교역현황과 과제
관세학회지
2003 .02
-
미국ㆍ일본ㆍ중국ㆍ한국간의 국제무역 파급효과 분석
무역학회지
2003 .04
-
Trade Structures and Relations among China, Japan, and Korea
Korea and the World Economy
2007 .05
-
韓中貿易と韓日FTA(自由貿易協定)の推進方向に關すゐ硏究
관세학회지
2005 .05
-
Trade Structures of and Trade Relations among China, Japan, and Korea
중국과 중국학
2007 .02
-
일본의 對동아시아 통상정책 변화와 추진방향에 관한 고찰
무역연구
2009 .01
-
한·중·일 농산물 경쟁력과 한·중 FTA 농산물 교역량증가 효과
농촌지도와 개발
2018 .01
-
17ㆍ18세기 對馬藩 무역에 관한 一考察 : 對馬藩의 무역 증감 요인 분석을 중심으로
동북아 문화연구
2004 .04
-
2000년대 이후 중국의 대북한 무역추이에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2008 .12
-
한국의 일본 수산물 수입금지조치에 대한 WTO 판정의 쟁점과 향후 통상 협상 방향에 대한 논의
무역연구
2019 .01
-
전자무역 구현특성에 따른 성과측정 지표 연구
인터넷전자상거래연구
2009 .06
-
Structural Changes in China's Import Market for Domestic Demand and Implications
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2016 .10
-
수출이 수입유발에 미치는 효과에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2007 .12
-
한국과 동아시아국가간 무역구조변화와 그 요인에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2006 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-016110050