지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
When Japanese study Korean mythology by the comparative method, they focus on two things. One is their interest in Korean mythology which is similar to theirs, the other is that they point out Korean essentials in Japanese mythology.
Japanese tend to explain them in terms of the theory of horse riding people and culture diffusion and movement. It is true that the study implies the cultural exchange between Korea and Japan, but several problems remain.
The first problem is that Japanese hardly ever studied creation mythology by the comparative method because they focused too much on literature mythology. The second problem is that, relying much on diffusionism, Japanese are negligent in pointing out the differences between Korea and Japan. The third problem is that Japanese are not likely to study the mythical speculation systems of Korea and Japan by comparison.
To solve these problems, the object of study should be extended not only to literature but also to folklore. Moreover, diversity as well as similarity should be studied. We will be able to clarify more characteristics of mythology in the two countries, if we develop various study method and keep studying by the comparative method.
Japanese tend to explain them in terms of the theory of horse riding people and culture diffusion and movement. It is true that the study implies the cultural exchange between Korea and Japan, but several problems remain.
The first problem is that Japanese hardly ever studied creation mythology by the comparative method because they focused too much on literature mythology. The second problem is that, relying much on diffusionism, Japanese are negligent in pointing out the differences between Korea and Japan. The third problem is that Japanese are not likely to study the mythical speculation systems of Korea and Japan by comparison.
To solve these problems, the object of study should be extended not only to literature but also to folklore. Moreover, diversity as well as similarity should be studied. We will be able to clarify more characteristics of mythology in the two countries, if we develop various study method and keep studying by the comparative method.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 유사성과 친연성
Ⅲ. 일본신화 속의 한국신화
Ⅳ. 기마민족설과 한일신화
Ⅴ. 문화의 전파와 복합
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Some Aspects of Korean Mythology
Korea Journal
1975 .12
-
C.G. 융과 신화
서강인문논총
2002 .12
-
日本神話硏究史の 一考察
원불교사상과종교문화
2011 .01
-
맺지 않은 매듭 : 袁珂의 廣義神話論과 1980년대 중국신화 대토론
중어중문학
2010 .12
-
‘고대’를 보는 ‘근대’의 지(知)적 회로 ─최남선의 <말>과 <사물> 논리─
日本學硏究
2013 .01
-
Egg Mythology in Korea and Central Asia
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
1998 .09
-
가야의 建國神話와 祭儀
한국고대사연구
2005 .09
-
신화와 일제 식민주의 교육
비교민속학
2005 .08
-
신화를 통해 본 여성의 임무와 그 의미
민속학연구
1996 .10
-
Japanese Studies in Korea
Korea Journal
1965 .06
-
로트만과 고골의 대화 : 기호와 현실의 관계에 대한 신화적 인식을 중심으로
노어노문학
2005 .12
-
葉舒憲의 儒家神話論에 대한 비판적 고찰
중국어문학논집
2016 .02
-
한ㆍ중 주요 시조신화 중 난생신화의 연구
아시아문화연구
2013 .09
-
기호학과 비교신화학
비교민속학
2012 .04
-
장소화의 양상과 의미 탐구 - 신화 공간을 중심으로
로컬리티 인문학
2019 .10
-
韓国大学生が関心を持つ日本の「文化」
日本語敎育
2019 .01
-
廣義神話論에서 廣義神話學으로 － 袁珂의 신화개념 확장과 중국신화학의 현재
중국소설논총
2011 .01
-
인류학과 茅盾의 신화연구
중국어문학논집
2005 .04
-
한국신화의 주체적 인식과 민족문화의 정체성
고조선단군학
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-380-015982009