지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There was a heated debate in the 1980s China to determine the range and characteristics of Chinese mythology and discern what could be the mythological elements or features that defined mythology as a genre. It could even be said that China had a fever for mythology at the time. This ‘great debate over Chinese mythology’ that continued on for nearly a decade was incited by the most renowned scholar of Chinese mythology in the twentieth century, Yuanke (袁珂). He proposed the broad definition of mythology which disrupted the existing classification of mythology and lifted the time limit within which mythology was created, hence, argued that mythology was still being created.
The Chinese mythologists, who based their ideas on Marxist theory as their principal source, contested Yuanke’s argument with the narrow definition of mythology, using one of Marx’s comments on mythology that it was created in the primitive and disappeared with the primitive age. However, this debate which went on for nearly ten years came to an abrupt halt in the 1990s without reaching any kind of agreement or conclusion. As if the opposing mythologists have come to a tacit agreement not to take Yuanke seriously, they did not bring up the broad definition of mythology any more. Two contesting views, without touching on the other, separately published books based on their own definitions of mythology, one side based on Yuanke’s view of mythology and the other based on the view of narrow definition of mythology.
Focusing on this strange phenomenon, this paper aims to examine the debate in the 1980s and tries to present a diagnosis as to why it came to such an abrupt halt without reaching any conclusion. Among the many explanations, it seems to have been induced by the collision between the Chinese mythologists’ strong aspiration to create a rich source of myths which could be comparable to that of Greek myth and their dream to realize a Marxist view of revolution, at the same time. That is, when the idea of ‘China’ and that of ‘Marx’ collided, Chinese scholars could deny neither of them.
The Chinese mythologists, who based their ideas on Marxist theory as their principal source, contested Yuanke’s argument with the narrow definition of mythology, using one of Marx’s comments on mythology that it was created in the primitive and disappeared with the primitive age. However, this debate which went on for nearly ten years came to an abrupt halt in the 1990s without reaching any kind of agreement or conclusion. As if the opposing mythologists have come to a tacit agreement not to take Yuanke seriously, they did not bring up the broad definition of mythology any more. Two contesting views, without touching on the other, separately published books based on their own definitions of mythology, one side based on Yuanke’s view of mythology and the other based on the view of narrow definition of mythology.
Focusing on this strange phenomenon, this paper aims to examine the debate in the 1980s and tries to present a diagnosis as to why it came to such an abrupt halt without reaching any conclusion. Among the many explanations, it seems to have been induced by the collision between the Chinese mythologists’ strong aspiration to create a rich source of myths which could be comparable to that of Greek myth and their dream to realize a Marxist view of revolution, at the same time. That is, when the idea of ‘China’ and that of ‘Marx’ collided, Chinese scholars could deny neither of them.
목차
1. 들어가며
2. 맺지 않은 매듭, 중국신화 대토론
3. 중국신화대토론의 전개양상
4. 나오며
【參考文獻】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Some Aspects of Korean Mythology
Korea Journal
1975 .12
-
廣義神話論에서 廣義神話學으로 － 袁珂의 신화개념 확장과 중국신화학의 현재
중국소설논총
2011 .01
-
중국신화학에서 유가의 위상과 전용(轉用)
중국어문학논집
2017 .02
-
C.G. 융과 신화
서강인문논총
2002 .12
-
葉舒憲의 儒家神話論에 대한 비판적 고찰
중국어문학논집
2016 .02
-
Egg Mythology in Korea and Central Asia
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
1998 .09
-
日本神話硏究史の 一考察
원불교사상과종교문화
2011 .01
-
‘고대’를 보는 ‘근대’의 지(知)적 회로 ─최남선의 <말>과 <사물> 논리─
日本學硏究
2013 .01
-
일본에 있어서 한일신화의 비교연구
비교민속학
2007 .02
-
가야의 建國神話와 祭儀
한국고대사연구
2005 .09
-
인류학과 茅盾의 신화연구
중국어문학논집
2005 .04
-
신화와 일제 식민주의 교육
비교민속학
2005 .08
-
로트만과 고골의 대화 : 기호와 현실의 관계에 대한 신화적 인식을 중심으로
노어노문학
2005 .12
-
신화를 통해 본 여성의 임무와 그 의미
민속학연구
1996 .10
-
한ㆍ중 주요 시조신화 중 난생신화의 연구
아시아문화연구
2013 .09
-
구륭신화의 변천과 해석, 그리고 중국의 정체성
중국어문학논집
2019 .08
-
장소화의 양상과 의미 탐구 - 신화 공간을 중심으로
로컬리티 인문학
2019 .10
-
무속신화에 나타난 가족 이데올로기
돈암어문학
2006 .12
-
한국신화의 주체적 인식과 민족문화의 정체성
고조선단군학
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-820-004311456