지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Japanese people began to take an interest in Dangun from the sixteenth century and to record on the documents. And they adopted their own viewpoints on Japanese god Susanoo through the knowledge acquired from Buddhist literature and Japanese mythology since the eighteenth century. As time passed their views were theorized: Emperor Wudu was reincarnated into Dangun in Korea and Susanoo in Japan respectively. The interpretaton must have been based on Bonjisujeok Theory(Honji-suijaku Theory). The contact of Dangun and Susanoo originated from traditional Japanese thought.
A research group paid attention to the above contact. They suggested that both Japan and Joseon descend from the same ancestor, and insisted that Joseon be assimilated into Japan. They not only made their own speculative interpretation but also put it into practice: they started a drive to worship Dangun and Susanoo as ritual gods of Joseon Shrine. Despite their active movement, scholars and the Japanese Empire(both the Government General of Joseon and Japanese Government) opposed them and their movement was frustrated. It was because the doctrine did not have enough theoretical background and there existed so many risk factors provoking Korean nationalism.
As a result, Dangun was completely excluded. Joseon Shrine was excluded from all the shrines and Dangun from history education. In comparison, their treatment of Susanoo is quite different from that of Dangun. The theory of The Same Origin of Susanoo and Dangun was denied but the theory of Japanese Ruling of Ancient Korean Peninsular was still sustained and exploited continually by the supporters of the theory of The Same Ancestor of Japan and Korea. Due to the fact, the contact of Dangun and Susanoo was no more maintained and they should be separated from each other. In this sense, Dangun was a myth of complete failure in the theory of The Same Ancestor of Japan and Korea, while Susanoo can be evaluated as a myth of co-existence of failure and success.
A research group paid attention to the above contact. They suggested that both Japan and Joseon descend from the same ancestor, and insisted that Joseon be assimilated into Japan. They not only made their own speculative interpretation but also put it into practice: they started a drive to worship Dangun and Susanoo as ritual gods of Joseon Shrine. Despite their active movement, scholars and the Japanese Empire(both the Government General of Joseon and Japanese Government) opposed them and their movement was frustrated. It was because the doctrine did not have enough theoretical background and there existed so many risk factors provoking Korean nationalism.
As a result, Dangun was completely excluded. Joseon Shrine was excluded from all the shrines and Dangun from history education. In comparison, their treatment of Susanoo is quite different from that of Dangun. The theory of The Same Origin of Susanoo and Dangun was denied but the theory of Japanese Ruling of Ancient Korean Peninsular was still sustained and exploited continually by the supporters of the theory of The Same Ancestor of Japan and Korea. Due to the fact, the contact of Dangun and Susanoo was no more maintained and they should be separated from each other. In this sense, Dangun was a myth of complete failure in the theory of The Same Ancestor of Japan and Korea, while Susanoo can be evaluated as a myth of co-existence of failure and success.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 단군과 스사노오의 동일설
3. 일선동조론자들이 본 단군과 스사노오
4. 단군과 스사노오의 종말
5. 마무리
참고문헌
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-910-004449065