지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to suggest current Korean academical tasks for reunification idealization of Hong-ik-in-ghan(HIIG, 弘益人間) thought that was derived from the founder of the Korean nation, Tan-gun(TG, 檀君). HIIG, which was the founding ideology of Ancient Chosun as the contents of the earliest King Tan-gun, is a Korean traditional expression meaning the worthy life to provide wide benefits to all the human societies and others.
Throughout its history, by TG, Korean people have been animated by strong feelings as an ethnic population. Most Koreans, ranging from children to adults, look upon Tan-gun as the personification that symbolizes their national identity. Even both South and North Korea, divided by Western political ideologies or democracy and communism, suggest TG’s history as the national epic, and also have a national holiday and holy places to celebrate him. It represents that TG is an important key in understanding the Korean thoughts and solving their conflicts.
However there are significant different understandings of TG. The differences are variantly explained: TG in South Korea has been understood as the legendary founder of Korea, while in North Korea as the real history establishing Ancient Chosun. North Korea has claimed they had dug up the TG’s mausoleum in Pyongyang district in 1993.
Further, HIIG thought in South Korea has been interpreted in terms of Western citizenship and anti-communism since around 1949, while in North Korea in terms of the class-struggle history of Karl Marx's socialist perspective and the Juche political ideology. Although North Koreans look upon TG as the founder of the Korean people, they have the tendency of anti-HIIG in view of socialist ideology. These differences are indicative of great limitations for HIIG thought to become the national ideology of Korean reunification.
Thus this paper attempts to provide a guideline for confronting academical tasks to reduce the differences between South and North Korea, in terms of study domains, methodologies, historical approaches, and philosophical study field. Results of this study are reported as follows: “Different Understandings on TG & HIIG within South and North Korea” (Chapter Ⅱ), “Causes of Different Understandings between South and North Korea” (Chapter Ⅲ), and “Current Academical Tasks on Idealizing of HIIG for Korean Reunification” (Chapter Ⅳ).
Throughout its history, by TG, Korean people have been animated by strong feelings as an ethnic population. Most Koreans, ranging from children to adults, look upon Tan-gun as the personification that symbolizes their national identity. Even both South and North Korea, divided by Western political ideologies or democracy and communism, suggest TG’s history as the national epic, and also have a national holiday and holy places to celebrate him. It represents that TG is an important key in understanding the Korean thoughts and solving their conflicts.
However there are significant different understandings of TG. The differences are variantly explained: TG in South Korea has been understood as the legendary founder of Korea, while in North Korea as the real history establishing Ancient Chosun. North Korea has claimed they had dug up the TG’s mausoleum in Pyongyang district in 1993.
Further, HIIG thought in South Korea has been interpreted in terms of Western citizenship and anti-communism since around 1949, while in North Korea in terms of the class-struggle history of Karl Marx's socialist perspective and the Juche political ideology. Although North Koreans look upon TG as the founder of the Korean people, they have the tendency of anti-HIIG in view of socialist ideology. These differences are indicative of great limitations for HIIG thought to become the national ideology of Korean reunification.
Thus this paper attempts to provide a guideline for confronting academical tasks to reduce the differences between South and North Korea, in terms of study domains, methodologies, historical approaches, and philosophical study field. Results of this study are reported as follows: “Different Understandings on TG & HIIG within South and North Korea” (Chapter Ⅱ), “Causes of Different Understandings between South and North Korea” (Chapter Ⅲ), and “Current Academical Tasks on Idealizing of HIIG for Korean Reunification” (Chapter Ⅳ).
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말: 홍익인간 연구의 필요성
Ⅱ. 단군과 홍익인간에 대한 남북한의 입장
Ⅲ. 홍익인간에 대한 남북한 시각차의 원인
Ⅳ. 홍익인간의 통일이념화를 위한 학계의 당면과제
Ⅴ. 맺는말: 남북통일이념 형성을 기원하며
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
정보화시대에서의 홍익인간 : 연구동향 반성과 발전영역 탐색을 중심으로
고조선단군학
2007 .12
-
북한사회의 전통문화 인식
한국민족문화
2006 .04
-
남북한과『역사비평』 : 25년의 성과와 방향
역사비평
2012 .08
-
북한문학에 반영된 한국 현대사 연구 - 주요 역사적 사건을 통한 남북한 문학의 비교론적 관점을 중심으로 -
한국문학논총
2008 .01
-
통일을 대비한 남북한 가치관과 교육이념 연구
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2001 .09
-
북한 6차 핵실험과 대외정책을 통해 본 남북한 교회교류 전망
신학과 목회
2017 .11
-
평화통일과 홍익인간사상
고조선단군학
2005 .12
-
' 사람의 통일 ' 을 위한 교회의 역할 : 남북한 문화통합을 중심으로
한국기독교신학논총
2000 .10
-
통일시대를 향한 북한시의 미적 가능성
한국문학논총
2005 .01
-
Conflict and Development of the North-South Relationship in Korea
Korea Journal
1985 .08
-
북한과 중국의 미국식 인권개념에 대한 입장
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .06
-
교육대학 학생들의 북한 인식과 북한이해교육의 과제: 2016~2018년 「북한과 통일론」의 사례
윤리연구
2019 .01
-
Language Policies and their Effects in south and north Korea
언어
1980 .12
-
북한 주요 종교의 현황과 남북 종교교류의 가능성에 대한 연구
한국기독교와 역사
2002 .02
-
統一과 國史敎育
역사와실학
2002 .01
-
한국청년 그리스도인과 한국교회의 통일선교방안
신학지남
2017 .06
-
The Political and Human Rights Issues Surrounding North Korean Defectors
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2006 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-017674352