지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.6
- 수록면
- 87 - 109 (26page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper attempts to analyze China and North Korea's countermeasures against the U. S. North Korean Human Rights Act by explaining the Act with the hegemonic model so as to map out South Korea's policy options to enhance the human rights of North Korea. South Korea's progressive NGO groups and Human rights Committees have criticized the Act as causing an escalation of tension on the Korean Peninsula and being a pretext to military attack.
But when we compare it with the Cuba Liberty and Democracy Act the North Korea Human Rights Act is benign in comparison because there are to be no economic sanctions against the North Korean regime in the North Korean Human Rights Act.
Cuba is much better than North Korea in abiding to Human Rights conditions. In addition to that, the opinion that the legislation of the Act is just a prelude to military attack have turned out to be groundless.
The purpose of the Human Rights Act is to promote North Korean human rights by modifying their leadership. But China and North Korea have reached an agreement to send refugees back to North Korea breaching the protocol between China and the U. N. China is shunning the responsibility to protect North Korean refugees by regarding them as just economic migrants. The fact that U. S. hegemonic influence is always lurking in the background of human rights regimes and puts pressure on China and North Korea, which advocate the U. S. ideologies of liberal democracy, market economy and human rights, can be properly explained in terms of the hegemony model. ill spite of mounting international pressures to China and North Korea, China's consistent policy of sending North Korean refugees to North Korea is construed as its attempt to stabilize the North Korean regime so as to use the North Korean region as a buffer zone to keep the U. S. in check. Meanwhile, China tries to consolidate the China-North Korean cooperation system to maintain a socialistic system by keeping in check U. S. dominance on the Korean Peninsula. China has tried to curb the mass influx of North Korean refugees by legislating a new immigration law.
China shows its expansionism by extending its political influence even to the South Korean region by an alliance with the pro-North Korean forces in South Korea in order to put pressure on getting the U. S. troops out of South Korea. To guard against China and North Korea's strategy to ally themselves with the pro-North Korean forces of anti-Americanism, anti-conservatism, and anti-liberalism in South Korea, the South Korean government has to strengthen its alliance system with liberal democracy and the free market system. Simultaneously, the South Korean government has to take the initiative in pressuring and persuading the North Korean leadership to change its intrinsic lack of recognition of human rights.
But when we compare it with the Cuba Liberty and Democracy Act the North Korea Human Rights Act is benign in comparison because there are to be no economic sanctions against the North Korean regime in the North Korean Human Rights Act.
Cuba is much better than North Korea in abiding to Human Rights conditions. In addition to that, the opinion that the legislation of the Act is just a prelude to military attack have turned out to be groundless.
The purpose of the Human Rights Act is to promote North Korean human rights by modifying their leadership. But China and North Korea have reached an agreement to send refugees back to North Korea breaching the protocol between China and the U. N. China is shunning the responsibility to protect North Korean refugees by regarding them as just economic migrants. The fact that U. S. hegemonic influence is always lurking in the background of human rights regimes and puts pressure on China and North Korea, which advocate the U. S. ideologies of liberal democracy, market economy and human rights, can be properly explained in terms of the hegemony model. ill spite of mounting international pressures to China and North Korea, China's consistent policy of sending North Korean refugees to North Korea is construed as its attempt to stabilize the North Korean regime so as to use the North Korean region as a buffer zone to keep the U. S. in check. Meanwhile, China tries to consolidate the China-North Korean cooperation system to maintain a socialistic system by keeping in check U. S. dominance on the Korean Peninsula. China has tried to curb the mass influx of North Korean refugees by legislating a new immigration law.
China shows its expansionism by extending its political influence even to the South Korean region by an alliance with the pro-North Korean forces in South Korea in order to put pressure on getting the U. S. troops out of South Korea. To guard against China and North Korea's strategy to ally themselves with the pro-North Korean forces of anti-Americanism, anti-conservatism, and anti-liberalism in South Korea, the South Korean government has to strengthen its alliance system with liberal democracy and the free market system. Simultaneously, the South Korean government has to take the initiative in pressuring and persuading the North Korean leadership to change its intrinsic lack of recognition of human rights.
목차
Ⅰ. 인권과 주권
Ⅱ. 북한 인권법에 대한 논쟁
Ⅲ. 미국의 인권공세에 대한 북한과 중국의 입장
Ⅳ. 결론: 한국의 정책대안
참고문헌
English Abstract
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2004년12월28일자 / 조선은 자위적 억제력을 더욱 굳건히 다져가는 것으로 대답할 것이다
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2005년3월12일자 / 중국 미국의 인권실태를 폭로단죄
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 권혁철 / 2005 / 북한 인권문제는 ‘판도라 상자’인가 (446)
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김혜성 / 2004년12월24일자 / 반동적 인권공세에는 혁명적 인권공세로 힘에는 힘으로
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 리현도 / 2004년12월15일자 / 미국의 대조선적대시압살정책은 절대로 실현될 수 없다
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2005년3월12일자 / 중국 미국의 인권실태를 폭로단죄
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 권혁철 / 2005 / 북한 인권문제는 ‘판도라 상자’인가 (446)
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김혜성 / 2004년12월24일자 / 반동적 인권공세에는 혁명적 인권공세로 힘에는 힘으로
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 리현도 / 2004년12월15일자 / 미국의 대조선적대시압살정책은 절대로 실현될 수 없다
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Political and Human Rights Issues Surrounding North Korean Defectors
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2006 .03
-
북한문학에 반영된 한국 현대사 연구 - 주요 역사적 사건을 통한 남북한 문학의 비교론적 관점을 중심으로 -
한국문학논총
2008 .01
-
남북한과『역사비평』 : 25년의 성과와 방향
역사비평
2012 .08
-
한⋅미⋅일 3국의 북한인권법 비교 연구
담론201
2016 .01
-
북한 6차 핵실험과 대외정책을 통해 본 남북한 교회교류 전망
신학과 목회
2017 .11
-
북한 인권 논의의 현황과 전망
사회와 철학
2005 .04
-
교육대학 학생들의 북한 인식과 북한이해교육의 과제: 2016~2018년 「북한과 통일론」의 사례
윤리연구
2019 .01
-
North Korean Industry, 1946-1950
Korea Journal
2001 .12
-
The Effectiveness of a Program to Train North Korean Teachers to Adjust to South Korean Society : Policy Implications for Supporting North Korean Escapees
Korea Journal
2015 .12
-
The Growth Status of North Korean Refugee Children in China
Korea Journal
2003 .09
-
노동신문에 나타난 북한 당국의 인권 담론 연구: 담론 변화에 대한 검토와 실천적 변화에 대한 기대
담론201
2019 .01
-
Language Policies and their Effects in south and north Korea
언어
1980 .12
-
남북한 사회통합의 통합 : 권리중심적 접근
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2002 .06
-
중국 시진핑 정부의 대북정책과 북핵문제
민족연구
2016 .01
-
Whither the North Korean Nuclear Issue?
Korea Journal
2005 .12
-
『연세현대한국어대사전』(가칭)의 북한말 표제어 유형과 기술 방향 : 남북 언어의 접점을 찾아서
한국사전학
2005 .04
-
북한이탈청소년 대안학교의 교과과정에 관한 비교연구
동서비교문학저널
2019 .12
-
1945~1948년 북한 소비조합 정책의 전개
역사와현실
2015 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-001733950