메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대문학회 한국현대문학연구 한국현대문학연구 제20집
발행연도
2006.12
수록면
177 - 225 (49page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Description is based on the representation of reality. Thus, as the description does not exist to ornament rhetorically, we have to consider both the described reality in the work and how that reality is described. During the first half of the twentieth century, discussions and arguments about description were progressed in many different ways. When Dae-jin, Baek introduced the naturalistic novels for the first time in Korea in 1915, he mentioned that we should describe the dark side of life in an unreserved and a straightforward way. But he didn't mention the name of Emile Zola, representative figure of French Naturalism. Emile Zola and the naturalistic description became the main themes of criticism in the discourse of Korean Naturalism of 1920s. This paper investigates the theory of 'naturalistic description' advocated in the discourse of Korean Naturalism of 1920s : description of the dark side of life, excessive description.
The critics of that time didn't figure out the positive side of naturalistic description but they had a very negative view of it. With the starting of the modern novels and the growing interest of the theory of novels, Dong-in, Kim organized a theory focused on the plot of novel. In his conception of plot, the description (excessive description) had no place and was closely linked to the negative image of French naturalist, Emile Zola. Young-hee, Park objected to excessive description because ha thought description as individualistic taste of the bourgeois. He considered the description of Naturalism as only a critic element of bourgeois, negated the description fundamentally. After turning from KAPF, however, he came to face the ironic situation that he should acknowledge the description for the literary truth in the theory of description, as in Ki-jin, Kim's.

목차

1. 서론 : 자연주의 〈사조〉에서 자연주의 〈담론〉으로
2. 1장 : 1920년대 문학과 프랑스 자연주의
3. 2장:에밀 졸라와 1920년대 한국문학에 나타난 자연주의적 묘사
4. 결론 : 세부적 진실을 드러내는 기법으로서 묘사
참고문헌
영문초록

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-017673206