지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
1) Nowadays we are faced with a historical distortion of China and Japan. One is a problem of ancient historical distortion by China, the other is a problem that idealization of colonialism and historical distortion of textbooks by Japan. The most important problem is a limit of Korean studies that be absorbed in a northern culture diffusionism The golden crown of Silla is not only the most beautiful pure golden crown, but also the best cultural heritages in the world But several Korean scholars insist that golden crown is not Korean culture, but is originated a hat of Siberia shaman. They infer the origin of golden crown in 5th century from a traditional craft of Siberia shaman in 19th century, Conclusionally they insist that our people don't have any authentic culture in Korean peninsula.
2) A Guillemoz who studied Korean Kut said that the concept of shaman show Korean Mudang could be not confuse with shaman, and he insist that if we could not proof a shamanism of Siberia and mid asia, and a Korean folk religion, we have to regard the Kut of Korea as that made by Korean people. And he note a originality of Korean Kut culture on viewing structural different for Mudang and shaman. We can't think of shamanism except for shaman. But in Korean Kut there are transmitted as variety ritual patterns that shaman don't participate. In the Maeulkut(village ritual) or rural society Byulsinkut(special ritual), community member charge a function of priest, there are no Mudang. Therefore we have to not regard our Kut tradition as a kind of shamanism, but independent Kut culture stand up to shamanism.
3) The theory that Silla golden crown is originated from shaman hat in Siberia also don't consider a basic principle of diffusionism. If we could conform culture diffusionism, we consider to each barometers of morphology, quantitative, and continuance. Already Korea has Kut culture different to shamanism, so barometer of quantitative is dissolved. And a barometer of geographical continuity is also dissolved, because another golden crown is not found between Kyungju and Siberia. On the contrary, golden crown is distributed in the southern Korean peninsula that the most far away from Siberia area.
4) From now, we have to make independent to golden crown of Silla from an antler of Siberia shaman's hat. Because Silla golden crown is which represent national foundation myth of Silla. And we have to release Korean Kut culture from shamanism of Siberia. Kut of Korea has originality differ from shamanism. Moreover, we have to recognize again entire theory and discourse that our culture originated from northern area or Siberia, and overcome Siberia origin theory. And a migration theory of northern people from northern area to the Korean peninsula is also task to overcome, These works is that release from diffusionism in methodical aspect, that find authenticity of national culture and that secure a diversity of world culture.
2) A Guillemoz who studied Korean Kut said that the concept of shaman show Korean Mudang could be not confuse with shaman, and he insist that if we could not proof a shamanism of Siberia and mid asia, and a Korean folk religion, we have to regard the Kut of Korea as that made by Korean people. And he note a originality of Korean Kut culture on viewing structural different for Mudang and shaman. We can't think of shamanism except for shaman. But in Korean Kut there are transmitted as variety ritual patterns that shaman don't participate. In the Maeulkut(village ritual) or rural society Byulsinkut(special ritual), community member charge a function of priest, there are no Mudang. Therefore we have to not regard our Kut tradition as a kind of shamanism, but independent Kut culture stand up to shamanism.
3) The theory that Silla golden crown is originated from shaman hat in Siberia also don't consider a basic principle of diffusionism. If we could conform culture diffusionism, we consider to each barometers of morphology, quantitative, and continuance. Already Korea has Kut culture different to shamanism, so barometer of quantitative is dissolved. And a barometer of geographical continuity is also dissolved, because another golden crown is not found between Kyungju and Siberia. On the contrary, golden crown is distributed in the southern Korean peninsula that the most far away from Siberia area.
4) From now, we have to make independent to golden crown of Silla from an antler of Siberia shaman's hat. Because Silla golden crown is which represent national foundation myth of Silla. And we have to release Korean Kut culture from shamanism of Siberia. Kut of Korea has originality differ from shamanism. Moreover, we have to recognize again entire theory and discourse that our culture originated from northern area or Siberia, and overcome Siberia origin theory. And a migration theory of northern people from northern area to the Korean peninsula is also task to overcome, These works is that release from diffusionism in methodical aspect, that find authenticity of national culture and that secure a diversity of world culture.
목차
Ⅰ. 신라는 알타이인의 신탁통치국가인가?
Ⅱ. 동북공정이 아니라 동남공정이 더 문제다
Ⅲ. 일제의 식민사관은 여전히 부처님 손바닥이다
Ⅳ. 시베리아 샤머니즘 기원설은 전파론적 전제의 한계다
Ⅴ. 시베리아 샤머니즘과 우리 굿은 이렇게 다르다
Ⅵ. 건국시조신화의 왕관은 같은 문화적 구조물이다
Ⅶ. 김알지 신화에서 금관의 기원을 찾는다
Ⅷ. 김알지 신화의 시각적 구조물이 금관이다
Ⅸ. 시베리아 기원설의 비판적 연구를 겨냥한다
참고문헌
참고문헌 (36)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
민속신앙의 비교연구와 민족문화의 정체성
비교민속학
2007 .08
-
맥락적 해석에 의한 김알지 신화와 신라문화의 정체성 재인식
비교민속학
2007 .02
-
The World of ‘Kut’ and Korean Optimism
Korea Journal
1973 .08
-
굿 문화사 연구의 성찰과 역사적 인식지평의 확대
한국무속학
2006 .02
-
한국 무속의 다양성 : 학적 담론과 무당의 정체성 형성 사이의 "고리효과"
종교연구
2012 .03
-
굿에 대한 인식제고를 위해 필요한 논의들 : 갈래론에 입각해서
한국무속학
2011 .08
-
한몽 무속 비교연구 : 입무과정과 무계의 분화 변천을 중심으로
비교민속학
2008 .02
-
Problems in the Study of Korean Shamanism
Korea Journal
1985 .05
-
경기도 남부 무속의 지역적 정체성 : 실태 소개를 중심으로
비교민속학
2005 .06
-
평택무속의 일반성과 특수성
한국무속학
2011 .08
-
Kut in Private and Public Ritual Spheres : Focusing on Hwanghaedo Kkot-maji Kut of 2004
한국무속학
2004 .08
-
러시아, 시베리아 작가들의 시베리아-유토피아, 디스토피아 테마
노어노문학
2004 .06
-
한국 근대기의 러시아 여행과 시베리아 담론
러시아어문학연구논집
2016 .01
-
고려시대 무(巫)의 종교적 역할과 분화
동방학지
2018 .01
-
풍물굿의 새로운 전망설정에 필요한 논의 : 현장 활성화 차원에서
실천민속학연구
2013 .08
-
굿의 치유 과정 연구 : 재수굿에서 만신과 단골의 굿하는 사례를 중심으로 하여
한국무속학
2016 .02
-
전통문화의 원천으로서 무 문화의 갈래와 위상 : 호남지역 세습무 집단을 중심으로
비교민속학
2011 .04
-
중국 상고무(上古巫)의 고찰
한국무속학
2003 .06
-
한국 무속복식의 역할에 관한 논의
비교민속학
2003 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-380-017630291