지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
For the last half of the century, the sovereign entities of the South and North sides of this peninsula have tried to establish their own identity. And they also claimed their own legitimacy, in the name of the Korean people and their history.
We could say that the peninsula's divided situation had a considerable impact on both sides' Korean historical studies, and those impacts were clearly mirrored in the history education which have been conducted by both sides as well. While the division of the peninsula was becoming more and more permanent, the governments and political leader groups of both sides continued to invest more and more efforts in their campaigns, claiming that they were the only legitimate entities that inherited the cause and legitimacy of the National movements of the Occupation period. So the most logical next step for them, was to enforce ideological educations in order to stabilize their respective positions.
The sovereign entity of the South claimed their own legitimacy as well, and also the inheritance of the Korean legacy, based on the existence of the Provisional Government and anti-Communist ideologies. The South also approached the issue of researches and education of the National movements from that perspective.
Since the liberation, dozens of history textbooks(either they were government designated/type-1 ones or authorized ones) have been published in South Korea. Designated or Authorized, those textbooks are all describing the heroic anti-Japanese struggles of the Korean soldiers. And at the same time they are all featuring perspectives that are actively supportive of anti-Communist ideologies, and they also consider the role of the Provisional government to be very important. The rightest leanings that the textbooks had shown over the years are only becoming stronger, even nowadays.
If educating certain issues such as the history of the Korean people's National movements are going to contribute not to the division but to the unification of the Korean people, there are many things to be done. First more references to the activities of the Communists should be inserted in order to achieve the least amount of balance for the contents of history textbooks. But efforts of that kind is rather technical in nature and certainly are not enough. Ideologically and philosophically active efforts based on sound historical understanding are definitely required, as only such kind of efforts would make it possible to establish a proper legitimacy for the unified Korea, a legitimacy which should be based upon the interest of the entire Korean population, and the independence and tradition of the Korean people. That kind of legitimacy would lead to a balanced and accurate understanding of the National movements conducted by the Korean people during the Occupation period.
We could say that the peninsula's divided situation had a considerable impact on both sides' Korean historical studies, and those impacts were clearly mirrored in the history education which have been conducted by both sides as well. While the division of the peninsula was becoming more and more permanent, the governments and political leader groups of both sides continued to invest more and more efforts in their campaigns, claiming that they were the only legitimate entities that inherited the cause and legitimacy of the National movements of the Occupation period. So the most logical next step for them, was to enforce ideological educations in order to stabilize their respective positions.
The sovereign entity of the South claimed their own legitimacy as well, and also the inheritance of the Korean legacy, based on the existence of the Provisional Government and anti-Communist ideologies. The South also approached the issue of researches and education of the National movements from that perspective.
Since the liberation, dozens of history textbooks(either they were government designated/type-1 ones or authorized ones) have been published in South Korea. Designated or Authorized, those textbooks are all describing the heroic anti-Japanese struggles of the Korean soldiers. And at the same time they are all featuring perspectives that are actively supportive of anti-Communist ideologies, and they also consider the role of the Provisional government to be very important. The rightest leanings that the textbooks had shown over the years are only becoming stronger, even nowadays.
If educating certain issues such as the history of the Korean people's National movements are going to contribute not to the division but to the unification of the Korean people, there are many things to be done. First more references to the activities of the Communists should be inserted in order to achieve the least amount of balance for the contents of history textbooks. But efforts of that kind is rather technical in nature and certainly are not enough. Ideologically and philosophically active efforts based on sound historical understanding are definitely required, as only such kind of efforts would make it possible to establish a proper legitimacy for the unified Korea, a legitimacy which should be based upon the interest of the entire Korean population, and the independence and tradition of the Korean people. That kind of legitimacy would lead to a balanced and accurate understanding of the National movements conducted by the Korean people during the Occupation period.
목차
1. 序言
2. 民族運動史 서술의 추이
3. 臨政法統論의 심화
4. 反共主義의 투영
5. 結語
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국교과서의 문제와 전망 : 근현대사를 중심으로
한국사연구
2002 .03
-
안재홍의 ‘己未運動’과 임정법통성의 역사의식
한국인물사연구
2012 .09
-
국정 『국사』 교과서와 검정 『한국사』 교과서의 현대사 체계와 내용 분석
역사와현실
2014 .06
-
The Controversy over the Legitimacy of the Korean Provisional Government during the Period of the National Representative Conference in Shanghai
Korea Journal
2011 .09
-
해방후 현대사 교육 내용 기준의 변천과 국사교과서 서술
역사학보
2010 .03
-
국사교과서 국정제도의 검토
역사교육
2004 .09
-
역사교과서의 사회문화적 기능과 국가 이데올로기
역사교육
2014 .09
-
제 7차 교육과정 高等學校 國史敎科書의 내용 분석
역사교육
2002 .12
-
교수요목기 중등 역사 검정 교과서의 발행 상황과 목록화
역사교육
2019 .09
-
한국사 교과서 검정 파동의 원인과 과제
역사와현실
2014 .06
-
『고등학교 한국사』 교과서의 러시아 지역 독립운동사 서술 현황과 과제
史叢(사총)
2013 .01
-
한국사 교과서 발행 국정화 담론의 맥락과 성격
역사교육
2014 .12
-
일본 역사교과서 문제와 그 전망
한국사연구
2002 .03
-
Problems in the Writing of Korean History Textbooks
Korea Journal
1998 .03
-
역사교과서 문제의 교재화와 학습자의 인식
역사와 세계
2009 .06
-
[한국사] 한국근현대사에서의 국가권력과 역사서술
역사학보
2014 .12
-
‘한국사 교과서’ 조선 후기 신분제 내용의 劃一과 固着
역사교육
2016 .03
-
7차 검인정 『한국근·현대사』 교과서 수록 지도의 구성과 경향성 : 일제 강점 이전 시기 대상 지도를 중심으로
역사와실학
2011 .11
-
중국 상하이 『역사』교과서 논쟁과 지식인 : 상하이 지역 고등학교 역사교과서의 변화
중국근현대사연구
2019 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015491334