지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Historical consciousness that was formed through active participation in the March 1st National Movement affected various political groups in their ideology and policy. This paper analyzes the case of Ahn Jae Hong as part of examining logical effects of the perception about the March 1st National Movement on the political groups’ nation-building movements following the national liberation on August 15, 1945.
Ahn Jae Hong perceived causality and continuity between the March 1st National Movement and the establishment of Korean Provisional Government, and this perception logically extended into asserting the legitimacy of the provisional government. Such a historical consciousness resulted, after the 1945 liberation, in emphasizing as a matter of course the successive legitimacy from March 1st National Movement, to Korean Provisional Government, and to Republic of Korea. He emphasized that the Republic of Korea must succeed the historical legitimacy of the Korean Provisional Government since the latter’s legitimacy arose from succeeding the spirit of the March 1st Movement.
This paper aimed at understanding how Ahn Jae Hong’s motivating reasons and activities for the March 1st National Movement formed the background to his theory of the Korean Provisional Government’s legitimacy. First, we examined what terms and phrases he used to define and articulate the March 1st National Movement. He most often used the term ’Gimi Movement,’ and this term contained his perspective of the movement that was beyond merely an event. Second, we described his activities prior to the March 1st National Movement and his motives for participating in the movement. Third, we reviewed his activities in the Korean Youths for Diplomatic Services that he regarded to be within the category of the March 1st National Movement. Finally, we examined how he understood the successive causality between the March 1st National Movement and the Korean Provisional Government, and how he connected it with his theory of the Korean Provisional Government’s legitimacy. His historical consciousness, which was shared by center-right nationalists, was the background behind his political position that was completely different from that of left-wing affiliates.
Ahn Jae Hong perceived causality and continuity between the March 1st National Movement and the establishment of Korean Provisional Government, and this perception logically extended into asserting the legitimacy of the provisional government. Such a historical consciousness resulted, after the 1945 liberation, in emphasizing as a matter of course the successive legitimacy from March 1st National Movement, to Korean Provisional Government, and to Republic of Korea. He emphasized that the Republic of Korea must succeed the historical legitimacy of the Korean Provisional Government since the latter’s legitimacy arose from succeeding the spirit of the March 1st Movement.
This paper aimed at understanding how Ahn Jae Hong’s motivating reasons and activities for the March 1st National Movement formed the background to his theory of the Korean Provisional Government’s legitimacy. First, we examined what terms and phrases he used to define and articulate the March 1st National Movement. He most often used the term ’Gimi Movement,’ and this term contained his perspective of the movement that was beyond merely an event. Second, we described his activities prior to the March 1st National Movement and his motives for participating in the movement. Third, we reviewed his activities in the Korean Youths for Diplomatic Services that he regarded to be within the category of the March 1st National Movement. Finally, we examined how he understood the successive causality between the March 1st National Movement and the Korean Provisional Government, and how he connected it with his theory of the Korean Provisional Government’s legitimacy. His historical consciousness, which was shared by center-right nationalists, was the background behind his political position that was completely different from that of left-wing affiliates.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 3·1민족운동에 참여한 활동 배경과 계기
Ⅲ. 대한민국청년외교단 활동
Ⅳ. 맺음말 : 3·1민족운동과 대한민국임시정부의 계기성·법통성 인식
참고문헌
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-051-001395557