메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
19세기영어권문학회 19세기 영어권 문학 19세기 영어권 문학 제9권 1호
발행연도
2005.2
수록면
261 - 280 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The text of Joseph Conrad's Under Western Eyes is not a line of words releasing a single theologial meaning but a multiple-dimensional space mainly due to the fact that the narrator, the language teacher and Englishman, whose position on the matter of literary imagination is opposite to that of the writer, Joseph Conrad. One of the writings of Razumov's moral growth is read here in this paper inspite of the distorted version of the narrator with the help of the implicit voice of the writer, whose position is ambiguous and dangerous as he at once identifies with and criticizes the West.
Even though Haldin and Razumov are Conrad's vision of solipsism and despair that results from the disintegration of community, Haldin's revolution, i.e., Haldin's assassination of Mr. de P― is “reckless―like a butcher―in the middle of all these innocent people―scattering death” and not an authentic challenge to the social order, whereas the problem of Razumov comes from the fact that the union of the energies of Western capitalism and the organic immanence of the religion of pre-capitalist societies can only block out the place of Razumov himself as “the true Razumov had his being in the willed, in the determined future―in that future menaced by the lawlessness of autocracy―for autocracy knows no law―and the lawlessness of revolution.” As Razumov lacks an identity in which he believes, he is particularly vulnerable to the insinuations of Mikulin. However, he found out later that the road to the Russian nation is not with those servants of the nation.
Razumov was so naive at first and becomes the skeptic. Razumov's impasse or aporia of consciousness begins with Haldin's confession of the weariness of revolutionary act because “Reform is impossible. There is nothing to reform. There is no legality, there are no institutions. There are only arbitrary decrees.” Razumov's confession to Natalia is a “declaration of independence” even though he has been unable to answer Mikulin's question of “where to?” Razumov understands that the revolutionists make the right historical desicions, however, he has no intention to be converted to Peter Ivanovitch's fanatic nor to be a slave of autocracy. As Razumov has “the misfortune to be born clear-eyed,” he can declare solemnly to the revolutionists that he is independent and make a proper confession of betrayal to Natalia to be washed clean.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-015215308