지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.12
- 수록면
- 363 - 386 (24page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A short and passing remark on the difference between his and Kipling's writing made by Conrad in the letter to Henri D. Davray of 26th January 1908 gives one food for thought. Conrad says there that Kipling is "a national" writer and that he "tells about his compatriots," but he himself, he "writes for them." This remark of Conrad's I examine in my essay. The difference between Kipling's "talking" and Conrad's "writing" is located in rhetorical level, but what is rhetorical gains philosophical dimension. The difference between Kipling's "speaking" and Conrad's "writing" captures the difference of their discourses and seals the literary rank of their writings. This difference is visible in the modes of narratives they use: in Kipling's it manifests itself in the way he affirms the symbols and rites of the community, in Conrad's in the manner he puts them in doubt or questions them.
Just as Rudyard Kipling's Anglo-Indianness saved him from being a die-hard imperialist, so Joseph Conrad's distrust of conventional wisdom made him alien to the idea of Empire. "Imperial" Kipling shows himself to be a proponent and a precursor of the melting pot community theory. New readings of Kipling's texts change opinions of his writing commonly expressed by some established critics of imperial discourse. I discuss this discourse on Conrad's writings too, to conclude that it is impossible to regard Heart of Darkness to be a novella written "from the imperialists' point of view."
Just as Rudyard Kipling's Anglo-Indianness saved him from being a die-hard imperialist, so Joseph Conrad's distrust of conventional wisdom made him alien to the idea of Empire. "Imperial" Kipling shows himself to be a proponent and a precursor of the melting pot community theory. New readings of Kipling's texts change opinions of his writing commonly expressed by some established critics of imperial discourse. I discuss this discourse on Conrad's writings too, to conclude that it is impossible to regard Heart of Darkness to be a novella written "from the imperialists' point of view."
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity in Conrad's Novels
신영어영문학
2000 .11
-
The Double Bind in Conrad’s Novels
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2018 .06
-
키플링의 『킴』에서 드러난 소설의 내적 분열 : 아일랜드 소년과 라마승과 제국
19세기 영어권 문학
2010 .08
-
콘라드 『비밀요원』의 극화 : 아이러니에 내재한 주변성 재현의 문제
19세기 영어권 문학
2008 .08
-
Dark Heart or Trickster?
19세기 영어권 문학
2005 .12
-
'The White Man's Burden' Reconsidered : A Subaltern Re-Reading of Kipling's Kim
19세기 영어권 문학
2005 .12
-
The Colonial History of Poland and Its Representation in Conrad's Heart of Darkness and Other Early Works
신영어영문학회 학술발표회 자료집
2005 .08
-
콘라드의 모호성: ꡔ어둠의 한가운데ꡕ에 구현된 사회-정치적 이데올로기
영어영문학21
2007 .01
-
The Comic Subtext of Conrad's Under Western Eyes
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2006 .05
-
식민전략 담론: 『킴』과 19세기 말 영국의 제국 경영
영어영문학
2014 .11
-
The GermiNation in the Narration of Colonial Reality: The Two Cases of Conrad and Joyce
제임스조이스 저널
2009 .01
-
The Nigger of the Narcissus 小考 : Conrad의 人間觀을 中心으로
영어영문학
1983 .10
-
『어둠의 핵심』의 서술 전략
19세기 영어권 문학
2008 .02
-
다의성의 미학 : Joseph Conrad의 Lord Jim을 중심으로
새한영어영문학
1989 .12
-
『암흑의 핵심』의 다원적 글읽기
코기토
2000 .12
-
조셉 콘라드의 어둠의 속의 비평적 수용에 관한 연
영어영문학연구
2002 .01
-
Double Binds in Two Works by Joseph Conrad : New Directions in Girardian Theory
영어영문학
2018 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-015592277