메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 아세아문제연구원 아세아연구 아세아연구 통권 119호
발행연도
2005.3
수록면
145 - 171 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In light of growing social inequity in Korea, this study coins welfare exclusion as a key reflection of labor market segmentation and explore causal factors affecting discriminated delivery of social welfare service. Our study uses the 6th survey data of the Korea Labor Income Panel Study and focuses on the sample group(N=3,468) of worker status. In the analytical models, whether to benefit form labor welfare services, comprised of three sub-variables, social insurances, statutory labor standards, and corporate infringe benefits, is examined by a set of explanatory variables, such as workers' personal attributes and their affiliated company's features. A key finding of this analysis is that social welfare programs, which are expected to protect the marginal workers group or the working poor and reduce social inequity, contribute to the intensification of labor segmentation in the country. The fracture lines of labor market, such as gender, education, firm size, employment status, unionization, job classification, are identified to significantly influence of the reproduction of welfare fragmentation among workers, rather than being reduced by welfare services. In other words, the present welfare system widens welfare gap as well as economic inequity between 'insiders' (male, regular workers, union members, and the highly educated at large firms) and 'outsiders' (female, irregular workers and the low educated at non-union small firms), under the existing institutional scheme and, sometimes, with the limited legal regulation. These findings hightlight a new policy approach to renew the welfare system and advance its regulatory tools for reducing labor market fragmentation.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 선행 연구 검토

Ⅲ. 분석자료와 방법

Ⅳ. 분석결과

Ⅴ. 맺음말 : 연구 함의와 시사점

참고문헌

Abstract

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-015194185