지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The problem of Dangunmyth has been discussed for several decades. If we view it as religion, We can ignore the importance of history of ancient Chosun. This argument will be the same as China and Japan. However if we see the Dangunmyth in terms of historical importance, it will be viewed as dictatorship that includes divine role. There is another view such as combining the character of religion and history of Dangunmyth. It brings into fundamental questions: national predominance and radical totalitarianism.
In this essay, I will point out the problem of those three views mentioned above and suggest a method. My method is based on "historical-critical methodology". Many scholars have build up their own methods of study in Dangunmyth specialized historical and religious approach. But we have still missed to approach Dangunmyth as a Hexahedron in a whole text, for example chinese classics, scripture, contains history, philosophy, literature, religion ethics and folklore.
Dangunmyth characterized contents of tradition of an outlook on the God-tradition, tradition of humanization and tradition of the rule of right(the principles of royalty). My study is focussed on more religious aspect than historical aspect of Dangunmyth. The outcome(result) is clear that Dangunmyth was created earlier than Chinese Religion. Already many scholars have tried to prove that especially in "historical changing of knowledge Dangun's research of literal tradition Dangun's myth in period of Koryeo". Ancient history of Dangunmyth and literal tradition in period of ancient Chosun belongs to a product before Ki-Ja Chosun, and then we have the literal tradition as additions formed in period of Koryeo(No, Tae-Don and Kang, Don-Ku).
Study on Dangunmyth in South-North Korea: North Korea mixed mythconcetion up conception of legend and of narratives and treats as same conception. North Korea emphasizes part of history, and denies the Being of Ki-Ja Chosun before the Dangun Chosun. But they look part of Hwanin as a fictive addition.
Instead of that, they decline towards the divine human and divine history. Since Il-Yeon interpreted Dangunmyth historically and literally, a tradition of interpretation has been formed. After that time Choi, Nam-Sun developed Dangunmyth scientifically in view point of history, literature, religion and philosophy. In a word a ancient history was described mythically.
Choi, Nam-Sun’s approach made me possible to develope historical- critical interpretation in case of Dangunmyth. For example, there are six cases.
1. Text Criticism. 2. Literal Traditions Criticism. 3. Linguistic Analysis. 4. Form and Gattungs-Criticism. 5. Traditions Criticism. 6. Theological Interpretation.
I will explore my approach based on same critical contents below:
Comparing text of Dangunmyth with the text of the Old Testament. We will compare and interpret view point of Heaven-God, Symbol of bear and tiger, message of Hwan-Woong with Woong-Nyeo, Motive of Mountain-God, Motive Immanuel.
Finally I will try combine spirit of Dangunmyth with nationalism(Hanism). Because it is principle of universalism and subject pro the world.
In this essay, I will point out the problem of those three views mentioned above and suggest a method. My method is based on "historical-critical methodology". Many scholars have build up their own methods of study in Dangunmyth specialized historical and religious approach. But we have still missed to approach Dangunmyth as a Hexahedron in a whole text, for example chinese classics, scripture, contains history, philosophy, literature, religion ethics and folklore.
Dangunmyth characterized contents of tradition of an outlook on the God-tradition, tradition of humanization and tradition of the rule of right(the principles of royalty). My study is focussed on more religious aspect than historical aspect of Dangunmyth. The outcome(result) is clear that Dangunmyth was created earlier than Chinese Religion. Already many scholars have tried to prove that especially in "historical changing of knowledge Dangun's research of literal tradition Dangun's myth in period of Koryeo". Ancient history of Dangunmyth and literal tradition in period of ancient Chosun belongs to a product before Ki-Ja Chosun, and then we have the literal tradition as additions formed in period of Koryeo(No, Tae-Don and Kang, Don-Ku).
Study on Dangunmyth in South-North Korea: North Korea mixed mythconcetion up conception of legend and of narratives and treats as same conception. North Korea emphasizes part of history, and denies the Being of Ki-Ja Chosun before the Dangun Chosun. But they look part of Hwanin as a fictive addition.
Instead of that, they decline towards the divine human and divine history. Since Il-Yeon interpreted Dangunmyth historically and literally, a tradition of interpretation has been formed. After that time Choi, Nam-Sun developed Dangunmyth scientifically in view point of history, literature, religion and philosophy. In a word a ancient history was described mythically.
Choi, Nam-Sun’s approach made me possible to develope historical- critical interpretation in case of Dangunmyth. For example, there are six cases.
1. Text Criticism. 2. Literal Traditions Criticism. 3. Linguistic Analysis. 4. Form and Gattungs-Criticism. 5. Traditions Criticism. 6. Theological Interpretation.
I will explore my approach based on same critical contents below:
Comparing text of Dangunmyth with the text of the Old Testament. We will compare and interpret view point of Heaven-God, Symbol of bear and tiger, message of Hwan-Woong with Woong-Nyeo, Motive of Mountain-God, Motive Immanuel.
Finally I will try combine spirit of Dangunmyth with nationalism(Hanism). Because it is principle of universalism and subject pro the world.
목차
Ⅰ. 연구계획
Ⅱ. 단군설화와 시내산 신현현 구조의 비교
Ⅲ. 단군설화 3신구조와 신약 예수족보의 공통점 모색
Ⅳ. 환웅과 웅녀의 결혼과 야웨와 인간의 결혼
Ⅴ. 단군신화의 신관
<참고문헌>
참고문헌 (38)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
단군설화의 역사비평적 해석-신관을 중심으로-
고조선단군학
2004 .06
-
포스트모던 역사인식과 역사학습
역사교육
2000 .06
-
The Study of Ancient Korean History and Its Problems
Korea Journal
1987 .12
-
전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
한국 고대사 연구의 반성과 대안 -실증과 반도의 낡은 인식을 뛰어넘어-
고조선단군학
2004 .12
-
南雲 李弘稙의 韓國古代史 認識 : 《韓國古代史의 硏究》를 중심으로
한국사연구
2009 .03
-
구약성서 해석을 위한 역사비평의 미래
한국기독교신학논총
2004 .07
-
고등학교 세계사 교과서의 중국고중세사 서술 : 역사 용어를 중심으로
역사교육
2017 .06
-
역사 서술의 문학성과 역사소설의 새로운 경향
국어국문학
2005 .12
-
한국 고대사의 계보학
한국고대사연구
2008 .12
-
朝鮮時代 政治史 연구와 國史敎育
역사교육
2003 .03
-
황국신민 양성을 위한 역사교육― 1944년 조선총독부편찬 『初等國史』를 중심으로 ―
日本語敎育
2017 .01
-
비판적 역사 읽기와 역사 쓰기
역사교육
2002 .03
-
日本 古代史像의 형성과 敎科書 서술
역사교육
1999 .09
-
[총설] 최근의 한중관계사·한일관계사 연구의 쇄도와 새로운 동양사 연구 방향의 탐색
역사학보
2014 .09
-
現代詩史 記述方法 考察
한국시학연구
2005 .12
-
History of Literary Criticism in Korea
Korea Journal
1973 .07
-
역사교사의 인지적 특성이 역사수업에 미치는 영향
역사교육
2004 .03
-
구약성서와 인문학 : 역사, 문학, 철학으로 읽는 구약성서
구약논단
2017 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-015115289