지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently mass of articles has been issued on the political history of the Chosun Dynasty, of which study began as a department of subject approach in the early 1980s. The characters of the political history writings after the 1990s are as follows. First, the positive research focused on the factional policies was executed and activated with the proper evidences. Second, there appeared issues on the arguments of the government by the literati and the historical periodization relating the former. Third, there has been no dispute over the historical facts and interpretations. Fourth, a sufficient number of scholars makes it possible to have published the articles either as a series or as a complement.
Particularly the scope of the historical understanding was enlarged relating to the politics of Chosun Dynasty as a new concept of periods was accepted. It has become possible to separate the Chosun Dynasty into three or four periods by this concept, instead of the old-fashioned dichotomous periodization. Especially the 17th and 18th century can be treated separatedly as the middle period of the history of Chosun.
According to the 7th National Curriculum, a new textbook of Korean history was published and shaped on the format of the subject approaches, which has serious problems about the periodization. There are 4 subjects in the textbook. In the politics subject, the new periodization of Chosun is applied. Contrary to it in the other subjects the Chosun Dynasty is separated into the early period and the late. The former is named 'recent age' but the latter is not indicated as a proper age but treated as a transitional times with ambiguous expression.
In order to overcome this absurdity, it is recommendable to put the political approach in the center of the textbook construction and to return to the annalistic approach. And we must prevent the textbook from being composed of unrelated subjects. Rather it is desirable to write the cultural, the economical, and the social aspects beforehand and later to colligate the related facts by explaining the political situation. For the political history has in itself the symbol of incubating the whole range of historical researches.
Particularly the scope of the historical understanding was enlarged relating to the politics of Chosun Dynasty as a new concept of periods was accepted. It has become possible to separate the Chosun Dynasty into three or four periods by this concept, instead of the old-fashioned dichotomous periodization. Especially the 17th and 18th century can be treated separatedly as the middle period of the history of Chosun.
According to the 7th National Curriculum, a new textbook of Korean history was published and shaped on the format of the subject approaches, which has serious problems about the periodization. There are 4 subjects in the textbook. In the politics subject, the new periodization of Chosun is applied. Contrary to it in the other subjects the Chosun Dynasty is separated into the early period and the late. The former is named 'recent age' but the latter is not indicated as a proper age but treated as a transitional times with ambiguous expression.
In order to overcome this absurdity, it is recommendable to put the political approach in the center of the textbook construction and to return to the annalistic approach. And we must prevent the textbook from being composed of unrelated subjects. Rather it is desirable to write the cultural, the economical, and the social aspects beforehand and later to colligate the related facts by explaining the political situation. For the political history has in itself the symbol of incubating the whole range of historical researches.
#조선시대 정치사
#제7차 교육과정
#국사교과서
#국사교육
#붕당정치론
#사림정치론
#시기구분
#조선중기
#시대구분
#통사체제
#the political history of the Chosun Dynasty
#the teaching of Korean history
#the 7th national curriculm
#textbook of Korean history
#the historical periodization
#the factional policies
#the arguments of the policies by the literati
#the middle period of the history of Chosun
#the annalistic approach
목차
1. 서언
2. 政治史 연구 및 연구동향 검토
3. 政治史 時期區分 문제의 대두
4. 國史敎科書의 서술내용과 國史敎育
5. 결어
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제 7차 교육과정 高等學校 國史敎科書의 내용 분석
역사교육
2002 .12
-
1960년~1970년대 한국사 개설서의 조선시대 상업사 서술과 상업사 연구
한국사연구
2019 .03
-
황국신민 양성을 위한 역사교육― 1944년 조선총독부편찬 『初等國史』를 중심으로 ―
日本語敎育
2017 .01
-
이기백의 한국사 시대구분론 -분류사를 중심으로-
韓國史學史學報
2015 .01
-
중학교 국사교육의 의미와 내용구성
역사교육
2012 .12
-
해방 이후∼1970년대 초반 한국사 개설서의 ‘근대’ 규정 및 시대구분의 변화
인문논총
2018 .01
-
전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
제1차 교육과정기 발행 『중등국사』 (역사교육연구회 엮음) 교과서의 특성과 의의
역사교육
2018 .06
-
해방후 현대사 교육 내용 기준의 변천과 국사교과서 서술
역사학보
2010 .03
-
역사교과서 문제의 교재화와 학습자의 인식
역사와 세계
2009 .06
-
동북아 시대에서 한국사 서술과 역사교육 : ‘국사’를 넘어서
역사교육
2005 .09
-
朝鮮後期 金鑢의 野史叢書 編纂과 그 意味
한국사연구
2002 .12
-
10학년 〈역사〉 교육과정의 ‘비교’ 내용 구성 방향
역사와 세계
2009 .06
-
Teleology, Discontinuity and World History: Periodization and Some Creation Myths of Modernity
The Asian review of world histories
2013 .01
-
문학사와 시대구분
동악어문학
1991 .11
-
역사교육 계열화를 위한 고등학교 국사교육 내용구성 방안
역사와 담론
2005 .04
-
교수요목기 중등 역사 검정 교과서의 발행 상황과 목록화
역사교육
2019 .09
-
이명박 정부의 역사 인식과 역사교육 정책
역사비평
2011 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015491329