메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 기업법연구 제19권 제2호
발행연도
2005.6
수록면
339 - 368 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In 1994 Microsoft signs a consent decree with the Justice Department, agreeing that its OS licenses will not contain conditions that apply to its other software. But Oct. 20, 1997, the DOJ files a petition, alleging the software maker violated the 1994 agreement by bundling Internet Explorer in Windows 95 and preventing computer makers from removing IE's functionality from the operating system. On May 18, 1998, a group of state attorneys general and the DOJ filed antitrust cases against Microsoft. Both seek permanent injunctions against Microsoft's inclusion of its browser software in Windows. The U.S. District Court determined that MS had maintained a monopoly in the market for Intel compatible PC operating systems in violation of §2; attempted to gain a monopoly in the market for internet browsers in violation of §2; and illegally tied two purportedly separate products, Windows and Internet Explorer, in violation of §1. But the Appeal Court reverse in part, and remand in part the District Court's judgment assessing liability.
In March, 2004, EU Commission ruled that Microsoft had failed to provide to rivals information that they needed to compete fairly in the market for server software and that the company has been offering Windows on the condition that it come bundled with Windows Media Player, stifling competition. According to the decision, Microsoft must refrain from using any commercial, technological or contractual terms that would have the effect of rendering the unbundled version of Windows less attractive or performing. In particular, it must not give PC manufacturers a discount conditional on their buying Windows together with the Windows Media player.
Regarding the cases above, this paper focused on comparing opinion of the relative authorities , US courts and EU commission, analyzing the comparison and the contrast over the two cases. In particular, the main focus was given to the comparison over the issues - Tying Windows with Explore and WMP, and refusal of compatibility information. Hopefully this research will lead us to find a solution about the controversial MS issues in Korea.

목차

Ⅰ. 序論

Ⅱ. 소프트웨어市場의 分析

Ⅲ. MS 事例의 主要 爭點과 制裁措置

Ⅳ. 결론

參考文獻

Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-017815634