지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The subject of this article is the criticism of Kim Nam-cheon in the last period of Japanese Imperialism. His criticism needs scrutinizing exquisitely, for it shows both his critical conclusive point and one of confrontal methods against the theory of "Overcoming of the Modern" and "the East Asian Community,"-contemporary dominant ideologies. This articles proceeds with
three following issues.
First, On the method of citing Lukacs. "The Fate of the Novel" widely accepted Lukacs' "Novel as the bourgeois epic". Their works agree with each other on their vision of the novel-novel is a typical genre of the bourgeois era; it intervenes and investigates the social corruption and contradictions; it is in the very middle of its turning point. Meanwhile, Kim didn't accept the notion
of Lukacs-"The era of socialist realism shall come." It's right to say that Kim accepted Lukacs partly, but we cannot regard it as a arbitrary acceptance. In order to escape from the mechanical schematization of socialist realism, Kim paid more attention to the detour of Lukacs' critical realism.
Secondly, on his theory of realism in the last period of Japanese Imperialism.
He supports realism as a critical weapon of distorted humanity in the period of egoism and total human status which will overcome the separation between individual and society. He puts an ideal human status as an aim and realist method as a practical process of pursuing it. Also it is the process of self-resolving his former dichotomous thought. Through this formula, Kim could accept Lukacs' vision on modal approach to the ancient epic.
Lastly, on the relationship between Kim and the theory of "Overcoming of the Modern" and "the East Asian Community" that is one of the contemporary dominant ideologies. He seemed to approve these ideologies for the sake of appearance, but he emphasized the differences of each nation. Moreover, he insisted that emphasis on the oriental be one of the great many counter-theories responding to the crisis of the western modern. Through this arguments, Kim kept his distance against contemporary totalitarianism and orientalism.
three following issues.
First, On the method of citing Lukacs. "The Fate of the Novel" widely accepted Lukacs' "Novel as the bourgeois epic". Their works agree with each other on their vision of the novel-novel is a typical genre of the bourgeois era; it intervenes and investigates the social corruption and contradictions; it is in the very middle of its turning point. Meanwhile, Kim didn't accept the notion
of Lukacs-"The era of socialist realism shall come." It's right to say that Kim accepted Lukacs partly, but we cannot regard it as a arbitrary acceptance. In order to escape from the mechanical schematization of socialist realism, Kim paid more attention to the detour of Lukacs' critical realism.
Secondly, on his theory of realism in the last period of Japanese Imperialism.
He supports realism as a critical weapon of distorted humanity in the period of egoism and total human status which will overcome the separation between individual and society. He puts an ideal human status as an aim and realist method as a practical process of pursuing it. Also it is the process of self-resolving his former dichotomous thought. Through this formula, Kim could accept Lukacs' vision on modal approach to the ancient epic.
Lastly, on the relationship between Kim and the theory of "Overcoming of the Modern" and "the East Asian Community" that is one of the contemporary dominant ideologies. He seemed to approve these ideologies for the sake of appearance, but he emphasized the differences of each nation. Moreover, he insisted that emphasis on the oriental be one of the great many counter-theories responding to the crisis of the western modern. Through this arguments, Kim kept his distance against contemporary totalitarianism and orientalism.
목차
1. 서론
2. 루카치 인용의 내적 논리
3. 근대 인간개념의 재구성과 새로운 소설의 전망
4. ‘신체제‘적 전망과의 거리두기와 ‘차이의 인식‘
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
해방기 진보적 리얼리즘론에 대한 일고(一考) : 1930년대 후반 리얼리즘론과의 관련성을 중심으로
한국근대문학연구
2005 .04
-
근대 소설어의 형성 과정 연구 : 김동인의 ｢소설작법｣과 소설론을 중심으로
국어국문학
2015 .12
-
신체제 이념과 김남천의 리얼리즘론
대동문화연구
2006 .01
-
소설개조론 연구 : ‘고발문학론’을 중심으로
비평문학
2010 .09
-
김남천의 창작방법론 변모과정 : 1930년대 작품을 중심으로
어문론집
2003 .12
-
Realism and the Korean Novel : An Attempt at a New Research Method
Korea Journal
1993 .03
-
식민지 시기 오영진의 영화예술론 연구
사이間SAI
2019 .01
-
사실주의(寫實主義, Realism)연구
동유럽발칸연구
2002 .01
-
일제말기 전향자들의 시국인식과 문화론 : 김명식을 중심으로
인문과학연구
2008 .02
-
애도와 물신 사이에서 : 『조선영화』를 중심으로 본 1990년대 북한영화 담론
어문론집
2011 .07
-
김기림 비평의 문명비평론적 성격에 관한 고찰
우리말글
2005 .08
-
한국 현대회화에서 리얼리즘의 의미지평 재구성
인간·환경·미래
2018 .04
-
보성전문학교에서 김일성종합대학으로 : 식민지 지식인 김광진의 생애와 경제사 연구
역사학보
2016 .12
-
한국 현대소설의 서술 기법 및 전략 연구 : 김동인의 소설론을 중심으로
비평문학
2008 .08
-
한국 초현실주의 시의 전개과정 고찰
한국시학연구
2000 .11
-
[논문] 김기림 비평에 나타난 근대의 추구와 초극의 문제
한국근대문학연구
2000 .04
-
모더니즘의 초극과 동양 인식 : 김기림의 30년대 중반 이후 비평을 중심으로
한국시학연구
2005 .08
-
The Spirit of Folksongs and Realism in Song - The Musical World of Kim Min-gi
Korea Journal
1987 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-014333874