메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국사회과교육연구학회 사회과교육 사회과교육 제41권 3호
발행연도
2002.10
수록면
125 - 152 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The author in this paper tries to evaluate whether textbooks can lead to appropriate learning contents and activities based on the purposes and contents illustrated in the National Curriculum. For this, the author first identifies educational purposes from the seventh National Curriculum, classifies them by the frameworks of knowledge, problem-solving ability, communication and participation, value and attitude, and then identifies learning contents and key features of learning activities according to the different grades. The direction statements are classified into three categories -fact identification, pursuit of logical relevancy, and free development, and the key features of learning activities of social studies in each grade are analyzed.
The results of this analysis are as follows. First of all, in the textbooks from third to fifth grade, the direction statements that are related to knowledge, problem-solving, and communication and participation are evenly distributed, and as a result, flexibility of students when they think and present is emphasized. In the case of sixth grade textbook, direction statements related to knowledge (the fact identification) are found more frequently compared with other grades, but creativity of students when they communicate is also emphasized. In this sense, overall, the relevancy of elementary level social studies textbooks is more or less positive. However, one interesting finding is that there is almost no direction statement that is related to the area of value and attitude.
Also, the author points out some problems as follows. Firstly, the level of knowledge appeared in the textbooks should be re-examined considering general learning ability of elementary school students. Secondly, rather than simply providing questions, direction statements should play the roles of making students raising questions by themselves and of guiding them into the problem-solving process. Thirdly, direction statements should play the roles of not only guiding inquiry studies and investigation activities but also analyzing and interpreting the results. Finally, in the current social studies textbooks, the direction statements are a little bit excessive so that it is hard to expect effectiveness of curriculum.



목차

≪내용 요약≫

Ⅰ.들어가며

Ⅱ.교육과정에 제시된 학습 목표 및 학습 활동

Ⅲ.교과서 발문 유형 분류

Ⅳ.교과서 발문 분석 결과

Ⅴ.교과서 학습 내용 및 활동의 적절성 분석

Ⅵ.마치며

[참고 문헌]

[Abstract]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-013980818