지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper focused on Kim Chang Hyeob(金昌協)’s study on the books of Zhuxi(朱熹) and its meaning in the historical context.
From 1686, Kim Chang Hyeob set to studying on the books of Zhuxi and compilation of Juja Daejeon Cha-eui(『朱子大全箚疑』) written by Song Si Yeol(宋時烈) in earnest. Kim Chang Hyoeb reported his opinion on Juja Daejeon Cha-eui’ to Song Si Yeol by letters. And sometimes Kim Chang Hyeob debated about the important theoretical issues of Juja Daejeon Cha-eui’ with Song Si Yeol.
After the death of Song Si Yeol in 1689, Kim Chang Hyeob took in charge of proofreading and correcting Juja Daejeon Cha-eui with Kwon Sang Ha(權尙夏). At that time, Kim Chang Hyeob and Kwon Sang Ha had some different theoretical viewpoints. After the death of Kim Chang Hyeob in 1708, Kwon Sang Ha took the responsibility of proofreading Juja Daejeon Cha-eui alone. So there was high probability that the issues on which Kim Chang Hyeob and K won Sang Ha had different view were revised according to Kwon Sang Ha’s theory. It could be the typical example that the content which Song Si Yeol acknowledged Kim Chang Hyeob’s theory of perception (知覺說) as the definitive theory of Zhuxi was deleted in Juja Daejcon Cha-eui.
Consequently Eo You Bong(魚有鳳) who was the disciple of Kim Chang Hyeob thought that his teacher’s comments and theory about Juja Daejeon were not reflected in full degree Juja Daejeon Cha-eui and compiled Juja Dacjeon Cha-eui Munmok(『朱子大全箚疑問目』) for handing his teacher’s theory of the Learning of Zhu(朱子學) to future generations and making up for the imperfection of Juja Daejeon Cha-eui. And in the hidden side of compilation of Juja Daejeon Gha-eui Munmok,. there was the academic competition for the main line of Song Si Yeol between the Nak school(洛學) and the Ho school(湖學).
From 1686, Kim Chang Hyeob set to studying on the books of Zhuxi and compilation of Juja Daejeon Cha-eui(『朱子大全箚疑』) written by Song Si Yeol(宋時烈) in earnest. Kim Chang Hyoeb reported his opinion on Juja Daejeon Cha-eui’ to Song Si Yeol by letters. And sometimes Kim Chang Hyeob debated about the important theoretical issues of Juja Daejeon Cha-eui’ with Song Si Yeol.
After the death of Song Si Yeol in 1689, Kim Chang Hyeob took in charge of proofreading and correcting Juja Daejeon Cha-eui with Kwon Sang Ha(權尙夏). At that time, Kim Chang Hyeob and Kwon Sang Ha had some different theoretical viewpoints. After the death of Kim Chang Hyeob in 1708, Kwon Sang Ha took the responsibility of proofreading Juja Daejeon Cha-eui alone. So there was high probability that the issues on which Kim Chang Hyeob and K won Sang Ha had different view were revised according to Kwon Sang Ha’s theory. It could be the typical example that the content which Song Si Yeol acknowledged Kim Chang Hyeob’s theory of perception (知覺說) as the definitive theory of Zhuxi was deleted in Juja Daejcon Cha-eui.
Consequently Eo You Bong(魚有鳳) who was the disciple of Kim Chang Hyeob thought that his teacher’s comments and theory about Juja Daejeon were not reflected in full degree Juja Daejeon Cha-eui and compiled Juja Dacjeon Cha-eui Munmok(『朱子大全箚疑問目』) for handing his teacher’s theory of the Learning of Zhu(朱子學) to future generations and making up for the imperfection of Juja Daejeon Cha-eui. And in the hidden side of compilation of Juja Daejeon Gha-eui Munmok,. there was the academic competition for the main line of Song Si Yeol between the Nak school(洛學) and the Ho school(湖學).
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 宋時烈-金昌協의 학문 교류와 『朱子大全箚疑』편찬
Ⅲ.『朱子大全箚疑問目』의 편찬 목적과 체재
Ⅳ.『朱子大全箚疑』와 『朱子大全箚疑問目』의 비교-‘知覺說’을 중심으로
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-003117788