메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박미정 (한국외국어대학교)
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 통번역연구소 통번역학연구 통번역학연구 제28권 제3호
발행연도
2024.8
수록면
57 - 80 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This case study aims to verify the reliability of intuitive assessments conducted by some instructors during comprehensive evaluations, such as midterms, finals, and graduation exams in interpreting and translation graduate programs. Specifically, this research focuses on validating the legitimacy of such intuitive assessments through peer evaluation of final exams, with the additional objective of deepening students' understanding of intuitive assessment. In market-based interpretation settings, the primary assessors of quality are the users (audience or clients). In education settings, that role is assumed by instructors and students. While students typically undergo evaluation to enhance their interpreting abilities, they also participate directly in peer assessment to improve metacognitive skills related to interpreting assessment. Quality assessment of interpretation often relies on accuracy, clarity, and fidelity; however, the overlap and ambiguity between these criteria pose a challenge to the practicality of quality assessment. Therefore, comprehensive assessments in interpreter training programs often adopt a holistic approach. This comprehensive and holistic assessment approach depends on intuition, a sophisticated cognitive structure developed through extensive learning and experience. However, assessments based on instructors' intuition may raise concerns about validity. The results of this case study indicate that the average rankings from the first round of intuitive assessments by 20 peer evaluators largely corresponded with those from the second round of scaled assessments. Through this peer evaluation case study, the validity of intuitive assessments in interpreting has been partially corroborated.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0