메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조영지 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
한국근대영미소설학회 근대영미소설 근대영미소설 제31권 제2호
발행연도
2024.8
수록면
31 - 57 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Against the backdrop of late 19th century British society where the traditional concept of the human as a unitary and autonomous self had been undermined, this essay approaches Arthur Machen’s The Great God Pan in terms of the divided human subjectivity through Jacques Lacan’s theory of the symbolic subject. As Lacan states, the subject is constituted within/by society or “the symbolic order,” whereby we should forgo parts of ourselves which the symbolic prohibits such as primitive (sexual) desire. The parts of ourselves which are prohibited by the symbolic—also known as “the objet a”—belong to “the real.” This process makes us a divided subject, alienated from our own parts. In the novel, the god Pan and his descendent, Helen Vaughan, are the embodiment of parts of ourselves prohibited by the symbolic, the “objet a.” In other words, they represent the primitive or wild savage, forbidden by Victorian society, which thus evokes a feeling of horror in the symbolic subjects encountering them. The subjects, however, are paradoxically attracted toward the god Pan and Helen because they are their lost “objet a” which the subjects originally contain but forgo to become a social subject. Through the encounter with the god Pan and Helen, the social subjects realize their own monstrous self, repressed within themselves.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0