지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to introduce the general contents and specific properties of Guillaume’s typology, which is named ‘TAG, théorie des aires glossogéniques (theory of glossogenic areas)’. As is well known, Gustave Guillaume (1883~1960) is an original French linguist, a successor to Saussure and simultaneously the founder of psychomécanique du langage (psychomechanics of language). He reinterpreted Saussure’s dichotomy ‘langue-parole’ as the integral/integration from langue to discours. This turn was possible through the discovery of ‘temps opératif (operative time)’ in synchrony. He conceives language as a sort of movement, that is to say, a mental cognitive process, represented by the ‘tenseur binaire radical (radical binary tensor)’.
His linguistic typology TAG is based on the dynamic viewpoint of linguistic activity. Language types are determined in terms of the difference in relative size between langue and discours, whose sum is always 1(=integrity) in all languages, anytime and anywhere. TAG is divided into three ‘aires glossogéniques (glossogenic areas)’. To the first ‘aire glossgénique (glossogenic area)’ belong isolating languages like Chinese, agglutinative languages like Turkish, and incorporating/polysynthetic languages like Basque and Inuit. In this type of languages, the ‘saisie lexicale (lexical prehension)’ is implemented at the place near to the ‘saisie radical (radical prehension)’ on the one hand and the ‘saisie phrastique (sentential prehension)’ on the other hand. To the second ‘aire glossgénique (glossogenic area)’ belong Semitic languages like Arabic. In this type of languages, the ‘saisie lexicale’ is split into two steps. One step is taken in the realm of langue, which constructs “pluri-consonantal root”, say, ‘K-T-B’. The other step is taken in the realm of discours, which constructs nouns kitab (book), katib (writer), and verbal sentences kataba (he wrote) through the insertion of “morphological vowels”. To the last third ‘aire glossgénique (glossogenic area)’ belong Indo-european inflectional languages like Latin, Greek, Russian, French, English. In this type of languages, the ‘saisie lexicale’ is the ending point of the ‘saisie radicale’ and at the same time the starting point for the ‘saisie phrastique’.
However, one should keep in mind that there is no 100% pure isolating language, no 100% pure agglutinative language, no 100% inflectional, polysynthetic language. Any language has hybrid typological properties, depending on the present ‘état de langue’. For instance, the Korean language, even though it is very often classified as an agglutinative language which the author does not deny at all, should be admitted to have multi-facets of linguistic type. Sometimes it has syntax operated by the fixed word order of constituents, sometimes it has grammatical morphemes like ‘josa’ and ‘eomi’ which behave as syntactic units and reveal even inflectional characteristics.
Finally, we present tree diagrams to show the way of constructing process of word, phrase, clause and sentence in Korean, insisting that Korean is a strong agglutinative, polysynthetic language and simultaneously a week inflectional, isolating language.
His linguistic typology TAG is based on the dynamic viewpoint of linguistic activity. Language types are determined in terms of the difference in relative size between langue and discours, whose sum is always 1(=integrity) in all languages, anytime and anywhere. TAG is divided into three ‘aires glossogéniques (glossogenic areas)’. To the first ‘aire glossgénique (glossogenic area)’ belong isolating languages like Chinese, agglutinative languages like Turkish, and incorporating/polysynthetic languages like Basque and Inuit. In this type of languages, the ‘saisie lexicale (lexical prehension)’ is implemented at the place near to the ‘saisie radical (radical prehension)’ on the one hand and the ‘saisie phrastique (sentential prehension)’ on the other hand. To the second ‘aire glossgénique (glossogenic area)’ belong Semitic languages like Arabic. In this type of languages, the ‘saisie lexicale’ is split into two steps. One step is taken in the realm of langue, which constructs “pluri-consonantal root”, say, ‘K-T-B’. The other step is taken in the realm of discours, which constructs nouns kitab (book), katib (writer), and verbal sentences kataba (he wrote) through the insertion of “morphological vowels”. To the last third ‘aire glossgénique (glossogenic area)’ belong Indo-european inflectional languages like Latin, Greek, Russian, French, English. In this type of languages, the ‘saisie lexicale’ is the ending point of the ‘saisie radicale’ and at the same time the starting point for the ‘saisie phrastique’.
However, one should keep in mind that there is no 100% pure isolating language, no 100% pure agglutinative language, no 100% inflectional, polysynthetic language. Any language has hybrid typological properties, depending on the present ‘état de langue’. For instance, the Korean language, even though it is very often classified as an agglutinative language which the author does not deny at all, should be admitted to have multi-facets of linguistic type. Sometimes it has syntax operated by the fixed word order of constituents, sometimes it has grammatical morphemes like ‘josa’ and ‘eomi’ which behave as syntactic units and reveal even inflectional characteristics.
Finally, we present tree diagrams to show the way of constructing process of word, phrase, clause and sentence in Korean, insisting that Korean is a strong agglutinative, polysynthetic language and simultaneously a week inflectional, isolating language.
#agglutinative
#discourse (discours)
#Gustave Guillaume
#isolating
#incorporating
#inflectional
#lexical prehension (saisie lexicale)
#linguistic typology
#operative time (temps opératif)
#polysynthetic
#psychomechanics of language (psychomécanique du langage)
#radical prehension (saisie radicale)
#sentential prehension (saisie phrastique)
#theory of glossogenic areas (théorie des aires glossogéniques)
#tongue (langue)
#word (mot)
#word-sentence (mot-phrase, holophrase)
#agglutinant
#discours
#isolant
#incorporant
#flexionnel
#saisie lexicale
#typologie linguistique
#temps opératif
#polysynthétique
#psychomécanique du langage
#saisie radicale
#saisie phrastique
#théorie des aires glossogéniques
#langue
#mot
#mot-phrase
목차
1. 서론
2. 정신역학론의 전개 과정
3. 기욤의 언어유형론
4. 한국어의 유형론, 어휘 포착(SL)의 위치
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
Résumé
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
프랑스의 외국어교육 다양화를 위한 제도적 노력과 한국의 외국어 교육에 대한 시사점
프랑스어권 문화예술연구
2016 .08
-
프랑스 및 영국의 외국어 교육 전략 분석을 통한 우리나라 외국어 교육의 전환점 모색
프랑스어권 문화예술연구
2015 .08
-
프랑스어 이중타동사구문 분석 － 유형론적 관점을 중심으로
불어문화권연구
2017 .01
-
프랑스 지역어에서 보이는 지명학의 사회문화적 기능과 혼종성: 브르타뉴어(le breton) 사례 연구
프랑스문화연구
2019 .01
-
프랑스 지역어의 경계와 사회문화적 표상(表象) - 법령 및 지중해교류를 중심으로 -
프랑스문화연구
2015 .01
-
상호문화주의와 프랑스의 언어정책: 현실과 원칙의 갈등
프랑스학연구
2018 .01
-
중세 프랑스어에 나타난 아랍어휘 차용 유형화 -지중해의 언어 혼종성 관점-
프랑스문화연구
2015 .01
-
베르베르어의 자⋅모음 체계 및 특성에 관한 연구 - 카빌어를 중심으로 -
프랑스문화연구
2015 .01
-
19세기 이개어 사전과 한-불/불-한 사전의 사용역 기술
프랑스문화연구
2018 .01
-
Law French의 형성과 언어적 특징
프랑스어권 문화예술연구
2020 .05
-
카빌어의 문법적 구조에 나타난 언어사용의 특성에 관한 연구 : 명사 개념을 중심으로
프랑스학연구
2015 .01
-
프랑스 지중해 코르시카 섬지역의 언어교류 유형화
프랑스문화연구
2016 .01
-
캐나다 퀘벡의 사용언어 질에 관하여
프랑스문화연구
2018 .01
-
베르베르어 사용 관련 정책 현황과 변화 가능성에 관한 소고 : 알제리의 경우를 중심으로
프랑스학연구
2015 .01
-
Le français en contexte québécois: l’usage et la norme
프랑스학연구
2016 .01
-
La langue francaise apres le Brexit en Union europeenne
프랑스문화연구
2021 .12
-
포스트 코로나 시대 대학의 외국어 교수⋅학습 환경 조성을 위한 제언
프랑스문화연구
2021 .09
-
로망스어 입문 교과서 Euro-mania에 나타난 다중언어주의 관점의 수업 활동: 모듈 19의 독해 활동을 중심으로
프랑스어권 문화예술연구
2024 .11
-
이리가레와 니키 드 생 팔 - 누가 누구를 말하는가?
美學(미학)
2022 .12
-
알제리 프랑스어 작가에게 있어서 언어와 타자의 문제 - 카텝 야신Kateb Yacine과 카멜 다우드Kamel Daoud를 중심으로
프랑스학연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092170029