메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Gyusang Jin (Chongshin University Graduate Schoo)
저널정보
대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제55호
발행연도
2024.10
수록면
126 - 162 (37page)
DOI
10.28977/jbtr.2024.10.55.126

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper uses the text linguistics of Eep Talstra, observes all the linguistic features at the grapheme, morpheme, phrase, clause, and text at all textual levels, judges the relationship between clauses whether it is parallel or hierarchical, and goes through the same process from the first clause to the last clause in a text, and discovers the syntactic-hierarchical structure of Deuteronomy. While scholars, Robert Longacre and Francis. I. Andersen, suggest that a text is an arrangement of lexemes, Talstra considers a text as a text hierarchy, which defines the function of a clause type depending on the context where it belongs. The same clause type, Wayyiqtol-X, could open a textual unit at a high textual level, or at a lower textual level. A text hierarchy helps a reader to sharpen the definition of a clause type. While previous scholars determined textual structure according to a thematic criterion, this study focuses on syntax, especially EDSFs (Elaborate Divine Speech Formulas) to demarcate major divisions in Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy (1:1-32:47 and 32:48-34:12), while BDSFs (Basic Divine Speech Formulas) demarcate micro-divisions under the EDSFs. The asyndetic tōledōt formulas compose the macro-structure of Genesis, while the EDSFs function as a structuring principle in the four books and compose the macro-structure of the Pentateuch. The structuring principles in Deuteronomy are MSFs (Moses’ Speaking Formulas), in which Moses called, spoke, or commanded a participant or a group of participants, and MAFs (Moses’ Agent Formulas), in which Moses moved, behaved, came, went or wrote. MSFs function as a macro-demarcation marker, while MAFs function as a micro-demarcation marker under MSFs. To be specific, this paper demarcates Deuteronomy into prologue (1:1-4:49), body 1 (5:1-28:69), body 2 (29:1-32:47), and epilogue (32:48-34:12). A pattern moving from a verb (hear) to (keep) splits the body 1 into four sub-divisions. In comparison, MAFs (WayX clauses describing the movement of Moses) split body 2 into four sub-divisions. This paper explains each division’s opening and closing markers and its inner structure and argues that the syntactic-hierarchical structure is a convincing way to read Deuteronomy. This paper also discusses scholarly demarcations, explains the effect of reading Deuteronomy as a text hierarchy, and argues its advantages. Lastly, this study summarizes its contribution to studying Deuteronomy. This paper does not undermine the textual structures according to thematic criterion but rather proposes that the text-hierarchy of Deuteronomy is a sound alternative method of reading Deuteronomy.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Methodology and its origin
3. Syntactic Hierarchical Structure of Deuteronomy
4. Discussions with scholars’ compartments
5. Conclusion
References
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-091063230