메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조건상 (부산대학교) 권용철 (양덕여자중학교) 이주영 (부산대학교) 채유리 (부산대학교)
저널정보
한국체육정책학회 한국체육정책학회지 한국체육정책학회지 제21권 제2호
발행연도
2023.5
수록면
31 - 45 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to explore the design strategies by extracting the elements necessary for program design to develop a physical education maker program. A total of 15 students including professors o physical education-related department, field physical education teachers, and fled maker education expert teachers were selected and conducted a Delphi survey and AHP on experts in three rounds. First, the problems and complementary points of current maker education were derived from the focus of specific subjects, lack of programs, one-time education, environment, subject convergence education, program development, persistence and practicality, and securing a makerspace. Second, interest and motivation, collaborative ability, cooperative problems, communication and sharing, suitability, and creative convergence capabilities were derived from the necessity of the physical education subject maker education program. Third, factors to be considered as class operation factors were the environment, tools and equipment, teachers with practical capabilities, and teaching and learning methods. Sub-factors included the educational environment, external environment, tools, equipment, enthusiasm, accumulation of know-how, teacher’s expertise, teacher’s manual, student educational materials, utilization media, outcome utilization plan, and evaluation factors. The upper areas of factors to be considered as class goals were the cultivation of convergence capabilities in physical education subjects, an integrated approach, value creation, and learner initiative. Sub-factors included breaking away from tool-based education, promoting other curriculum applicability, promoting thinking processes and physical activities, practicability, sharing and sharing thoughts, continuous challenges, inducing interest, value, self-esteem and achievement, and self-directed attitude. Fourth, among the upper areas of class operation elements, teacher factors with practical competency showed the highest weight In the lower areas, teachers’ expertise, educational environment, and tool factors were ranked high.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구 방법
Ⅲ. 연구 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-090262341