Diagnosis of Infectious Spondylitis Using Non-Contrast Enhanced MRI With Axial Diffusion-Weighted Images: Comparison With Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI

Choi Seung-Hoon; Hwang Jung-Min; Lee Seungeun; Lee So-Yeon; Jung Joon-Yong

doi:10.13104/imri.2022.1105

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Choi Seung-Hoon (Department of Radiology Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Korea.) Hwang Jung-Min (Department of Radiology Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Korea.) Lee Seungeun (Department of Radiology Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Korea.) Lee So-Yeon (Department of Radiology Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Korea.) Jung Joon-Yong (Department of Radiology Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Korea.)

저널정보: 대한자기공명의과학회 Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging 제27권 제2호

발행연도: 2023.6

수록면: 75 - 83 (9page)

DOI: 10.13104/imri.2022.1105

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performances of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-included non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to standard contrast-enhanced MRI for infectious spondylitis. Materials and Methods: This study involved 154 participants: a spondylitis group (n = 76) and a control group (n = 78) with Modic type 1 degeneration or recent compression fractures. Two readers independently reviewed paraspinal soft tissue signal change and abscess with 5-scale confidence scores based on two image sets: one featuring both non-contrast-enhanced MRI (NCEI) and DWI and the other consisting of NCEI and contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging (CEFST1). The diagnostic performance of the two image sets was compared using McNemar tests for sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) analysis. Interobserver agreements (κ) for each images sets were also calculated. Results: The sensitivity and specificity for infectious spondylitis were 90.8% and 69.2% for NCEI + DWI, 96.1% and 60.3% for NCEI + CEFST1 in reader 1, whereas it was 92.1% and 66.7% for NCEI + DWI, and 96.1% and 68.0% for NCEI + CEFST1 in reader 2. Sensitivities and specificities were not significantly different between NCEI + DWI and NCEI + CEFST1 (reader 1: p = 0.289, 0.065; reader 2: p = 0.250, > 0.999, respectively). However, the AUROC was not considerably different between the two modalities in only one reader (p = 0.306 in reader 1, p = 0.031 in reader 2). Interobserver agreement for infectious spondylitis was moderate (κ = 0.55) in NCEI + DWI and substantial (κ = 0.66) in NCEI + CEFST1. Conclusion: Non-contrast enhanced MRI with additional DWI is as effective for diagnosing infectious spondylitis as a contrast-enhanced MRI.

#Spondylitis #Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging #Contrast media

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!