메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김라애 (세종대학교) 정유경 (세종대학교)
저널정보
한국외식산업학회 한국외식산업학회지 한국외식산업학회지 제19권 제3호(통권 제60호)
발행연도
2023.6
수록면
161 - 177 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between consumers’ perceived risk and risk reduction strategies (RRS) in wine consumption. Furthermore, the study aims to investigate the effect of risk reduction strategies on wine purchase intention. The data were collected by an online survey of wine consumers and 266 were used for statistics. SPSS 25.0 was used to analyze demographic and exploratory factor analysis, and AMOS 22.0 were used to analyze confirmatory factor analysis and hypothesis testing using structural equation modeling. The result revealed that functional, social, and financial risk positively affect RRS which are store image, reassurance, seek information, and word-of-mouth. Physical risk has no influence on RRS except word-of-mouth. Finally, all of RRS were shown to have an effect on wine purchase intention but word-of-mouth was found to have no effect on purchase intention. When consumers perceive functional, social, and financial risk, they purchase wines at a well-known store, seek wine information, check whether they can get a warranty, and consider recommendations from employees at the store to release their risks. When consumers visit a store by its image, seek information, and seek product reassurance to reduce risks it leads to forming the purchase intention. This study applied the risk and RRS model to the Korean wine industry to investigate wine consumers deeply. Findings would help to provide the basis for future wine consumer research and be used to help domestic wine marketers establish more effective marketing strategies by examining consumers’ perceived risk and RRS in wine consumption.

목차

Abstract
I. 서론
II. 이론적 배경
III. 연구방법
IV. 실증분석
V. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2023-324-001734300