메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김성중 (동국대학교)
저널정보
새한영어영문학회 새한영어영문학 새한영어영문학 제65권 제2호
발행연도
2023.5
수록면
1 - 20 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
G. K. Chesterton, a celebrated late Victorian author, extols the virtues of nonsense literature in his essay “A Defense of Nonsense,” and employs paradoxes in his novel The Man Who Was Thursday. This essay attempts to decipher the reasons behind Chesterton"s admiration for such literary devices as nonsense and paradox, through a comprehensive examination of the novel. The story is replete with paradoxical elements, with the character of Sunday being the epitome of nonsense or paradox. All the characters in the novel struggle to define Sunday due to the seemingly nonsensical and paradoxical descriptions they provide. They refer to him as “the earth,” “the sun,” “shapeless protoplasm,” or “the universe.” These descriptions illustrate the inability to logically or rationally define Sunday. As an avowed Catholic, Chesterton espouses mysticism, which posits that truth cannot be logically or rationally explicated. This resembles apophatic theology in Orthodox Christianity, which holds that the essence of God is beyond human comprehension, as language is insufficient to describe the divine. The Man Who Was Thursday, abundant with nonsense and paradox, may prove to be a perplexing experience for readers. However, it seems to be precisely what Chesterton intended to convey: the mysticism of truth.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 본론
Ⅲ. 결론
인용문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0