메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
안석환 (숙명여자대학교)
저널정보
한국국제경영관리학회 국제경영리뷰 국제경영리뷰 제25권 제4호
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
109 - 122 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
One of the most notable achievements of game theory is the theoretic result called “Folk Theorem”. This theorem states that players who cannot achieve cooperative outcomes in a one-period (or short-term) relationship can succeed in making cooperation available to themselves in the repeated game of a stage game sufficiently many times and they are not severely myopic. Unfortunately, there are many observations in reality in which a longer-term relationship cannot produce cooperation among the parties who are placed in a repeated game situation and attach proper importance to the future. This paper presents a realistic explanation in a game theoretic framework to show how this can the case. The idea rests on the presence of a third party. Cooperative outcomes that could be obtained in the the repeated game between the two players in the absence of a third party can be obstructed by the externality emitted from a third party. Consider two players, and , who play a repeated game repeating a stage game in which pure strategy Nash equilibrium. is Pareto inefficient. Suppose that there is a third player, namely , who is engaged in repeated game with and . Suppose also that cooperation is not achieved between and J on account of 's myopia. Both and struves to find a way to achieve the cooperative outcome that makes both of them better off. If by any chance has the influence on , which is reflected in the games in the way that can affect the payoff structure of both the games that is engaged in. To be specific, 's stance toward Q affects the payoffs of the two normal-form games that is engaged in, one with and the other with . It can be in the interest of that it makes a strategic use of in order to achieve cooperation with . That is, this strategic influecne of on can benefit if (i) the gain to is greater than the loss to and; (ii) and make an arrangement that will induce to take a strategic advantag of . In this scenario, the cooperation between and which is achieved is thwarted by the presence of a third party. Rather, the cooperation between and which is not achieved if does not take a strategic use of is obtained when comes to have an incentive to treat and ruin its cooperation with by the strategic stance toward . This paper clearly shows that it might be hasty to conclude that adequately forward-looking players can reach an cooperative outcome. This paper helps understand a real-world relationship between Korea, Japan and USA in support of its theoretic finding.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0